GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

Place in the ranking	218	507
Place by popularity	85	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	58.41	1.61
Power efficiency	16.16	2.73
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Navi 24	GF110
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)	29 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$289

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6500 XT has 3528% better value for money than GTX 560 Ti 448.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	448
Core clock speed	2610 MHz	732 MHz
Boost clock speed	2815 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	5,400 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	210 Watt
Texture fill rate	180.2	40.99
Floating-point processing power	5.765 TFLOPS	1.312 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	40
TMUs	64	56
Ray Tracing Cores	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1280 MB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	2248 MHz	950 MHz
Memory bandwidth	143.9 GB/s	152.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.6	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
CUDA	-	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.81
+202%

GTX 560 Ti 448 8.21

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6500 XT 15712
+273%

GTX 560 Ti 448 4210

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	63 +250%	18−21 −250%
1440p	30 +233%	9−10 −233%
4K	17 +240%	5−6 −240%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.16	16.06
1440p	6.63	32.11
4K	11.71	57.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

72
+243%

21−24

−243%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +238%	16−18 −238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 +219%	16−18 −219%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +238%	24−27 −238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 +238%	16−18 −238%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +217%	18−20 −217%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +210%	21−24 −210%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +222%	45−50 −222%
Hitman 3	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +226%	35−40 −226%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +215%	27−30 −215%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +205%	21−24 −205%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +211%	27−30 −211%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +243%	30−33 −243%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +238%	16−18 −238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +207%	14−16 −207%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +238%	24−27 −238%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +240%	10−11 −240%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +217%	18−20 −217%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +210%	21−24 −210%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +222%	45−50 −222%
Hitman 3	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +226%	35−40 −226%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +215%	27−30 −215%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +205%	21−24 −205%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	107 +206%	35−40 −206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 +231%	16−18 −231%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +243%	30−33 −243%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50−55 +238%	16−18 −238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 +210%	10−11 −210%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +233%	9−10 −233%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +217%	18−20 −217%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +222%	45−50 −222%
Hitman 3	50−55 +213%	16−18 −213%
Horizon Zero Dawn	92 +207%	30−33 −207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	83 +207%	27−30 −207%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +238%	16−18 −238%
Watch Dogs: Legion	25 +213%	8−9 −213%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+205%

21−24

−205%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 +236%	14−16 −236%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +217%	12−14 −217%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +225%	8−9 −225%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 +229%	7−8 −229%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Cyberpunk 2077	17 +240%	5−6 −240%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
Forza Horizon 4	140−150 +213%	45−50 −213%
Hitman 3	27−30 +222%	9−10 −222%
Horizon Zero Dawn	66 +214%	21−24 −214%
Metro Exodus	57 +217%	18−20 −217%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	56 +211%	18−20 −211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +211%	45−50 −211%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+242%

12−14

−242%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +217%	6−7 −217%
Hitman 3	10 +233%	3−4 −233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +218%	40−45 −218%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +211%	9−10 −211%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	28 +211%	9−10 −211%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +275%	4−5 −275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 +500%	1−2 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Cyberpunk 2077	4 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 +213%	8−9 −213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10 +233%	3−4 −233%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

+250%

6−7
−250%

This is how RX 6500 XT and GTX 560 Ti 448 compete in popular games:

RX 6500 XT is 250% faster in 1080p
RX 6500 XT is 233% faster in 1440p
RX 6500 XT is 240% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.81	8.21
Recency	19 January 2022	29 November 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	1280 MB
Chip lithography	6 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	107 Watt	210 Watt

RX 6500 XT has a 202.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 540% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 566.7% more advanced lithography process, and 96.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.