Arc 8-Cores iGPU vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500 XT with Arc 8-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

RX 6500 XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 107 Watt
24.70
+36.2%

RX 6500 XT outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking204284
Place by popularity83not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.43no data
ArchitectureNavi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)Xe LPG
GPU code nameNavi 24Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$274 (1.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10248
Core clock speed2610 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2815 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Wattno data
Texture fill rate180.2no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6500 XT and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed18000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.70
+36.2%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 18.14

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6500 XT 22954
+87%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 12276

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 87% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6500 XT 76445
+77%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 43185

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 77% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6500 XT 15712
+81%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 8679

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 81% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6500 XT 91909
+116%
Arc 8-Cores iGPU 42473

Radeon RX 6500 XT outperforms Arc 8-Cores iGPU by 116% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+52.5%
40
−52.5%
1440p32
+100%
16
−100%
4K17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 72
+44%
50−55
−44%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51 no data
Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 50−55 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 176 no data
Metro Exodus 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 128 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 74 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43 no data
Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Hitman 3 23 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 95−100 no data
Metro Exodus 45 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+41.5%
65−70
−41.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 25 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 23 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Far Cry 5 57 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Hitman 3 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Metro Exodus 57
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
+40%
40−45
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 19 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Hitman 3 10 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Metro Exodus 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Hitman 3 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+37%
27−30
−37%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%

This is how RX 6500 XT and Arc 8-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT is 100% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT is 42% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.70 18.14
Recency 19 January 2022 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc 8-Cores iGPU in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop card while Arc 8-Cores iGPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU
Arc 8-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3029 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 30 votes

Rate Arc 8-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.