Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Radeon RX 6500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6500 XT with Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), including specs and performance data.

RX 6500 XT
2022
8 GB GDDR6, 107 Watt
24.80
+134%

RX 6500 XT outperforms Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) by a whopping 134% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking218433
Place by popularity85not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation58.36no data
Power efficiency16.11no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameNavi 24Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date19 January 2022 (2 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10244
Core clock speed2610 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2815 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors5,400 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology6 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)107 Wattno data
Texture fill rate180.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.765 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Ray Tracing Cores16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2248 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth143.9 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_2
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.2no data
Vulkan1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6500 XT 24.80
+134%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 10.58

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6500 XT 22954
+241%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 6726

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6500 XT 15712
+198%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 5281

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6500 XT 91909
+223%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 28417

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 6500 XT 356129
+20.6%
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 295187

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+133%
27
−133%
1440p30
+150%
12−14
−150%
4K17
+143%
7−8
−143%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.16no data
1440p6.63no data
4K11.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 72
+140%
30−33
−140%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+135%
21−24
−135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 51
+264%
14−16
−264%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+150%
20−22
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+159%
21−24
−159%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+141%
27−30
−141%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+123%
65−70
−123%
Hitman 3 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+111%
50−55
−111%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+174%
30−35
−174%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+163%
30−35
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+66.1%
60−65
−66.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+135%
21−24
−135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 43
+207%
14−16
−207%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+150%
20−22
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+143%
14−16
−143%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+159%
21−24
−159%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+141%
27−30
−141%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+123%
65−70
−123%
Hitman 3 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+111%
50−55
−111%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+174%
30−35
−174%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107
+174%
39
−174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+104%
24−27
−104%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+66.1%
60−65
−66.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+135%
21−24
−135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 31
+121%
14−16
−121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+150%
20−22
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+150%
12−14
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+159%
21−24
−159%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+123%
65−70
−123%
Hitman 3 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+70.4%
50−55
−70.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 83
+177%
30
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+238%
16
−238%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
−148%
60−65
+148%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+137%
27−30
−137%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+147%
18−20
−147%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+153%
14−16
−153%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+143%
7−8
−143%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+228%
40−45
−228%
Hitman 3 27−30
+123%
12−14
−123%
Horizon Zero Dawn 66
+230%
20−22
−230%
Metro Exodus 57
+307%
14−16
−307%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 56
+367%
12−14
−367%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+126%
60−65
−126%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Hitman 3 10
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+210%
40−45
−210%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+300%
7−8
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%

This is how RX 6500 XT and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is 133% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT is 150% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT is 143% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 367% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 148% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is ahead in 65 tests (98%)
  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.80 10.58
Recency 19 January 2022 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 6 nm 5 nm

RX 6500 XT has a 134.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6500 XT is a desktop card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3252 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.