GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 580X

Place in performance ranking	256	304
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.49	10.55
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Polaris 20	N18P-G62 Max-Q
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	11 April 2018 (6 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$191	$1183

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 580X has 37% better value for money than GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1024
Core clock speed	1257 MHz	1035 MHz
Boost clock speed	1340 MHz	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	193.0	76.80
Floating-point performance	6,175 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 580X and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	256.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 580X 20.19
+21.6%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.61

Radeon RX 580X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 580X 7798
+21.5%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6416

Radeon RX 580X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65−70 +20.4%	54 −20.4%
1440p	30−35 +7.1%	28 −7.1%
4K	27−30 +17.4%	23 −17.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27
+23.8%

21−24

−23.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	49 +22.5%	40−45 −22.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +26.7%	30−33 −26.7%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +30%	60−65 −30%
Hitman 3	45 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	107 +25.9%	85−90 −25.9%
Metro Exodus	86 +22.9%	70−75 −22.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	63 +26%	50−55 −26%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	77 +28.3%	60−65 −28.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	49 +22.5%	40−45 −22.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	50−55 +35%	40−45 −35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	34 +25.9%	27−30 −25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +28.6%	35−40 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +30%	60−65 −30%
Hitman 3	36 +33.3%	27−30 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +32%	50−55 −32%
Metro Exodus	58 +28.9%	45−50 −28.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 +32.5%	40−45 −32.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 +24%	50−55 −24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
Watch Dogs: Legion	193 +28.7%	150−160 −28.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	19 +35.7%	14−16 −35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	22 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +30%	30−33 −30%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +30%	60−65 −30%
Horizon Zero Dawn	57 +26.7%	45−50 −26.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

46
+31.4%

35−40

−31.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +41.7%	12−14 −41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Far Cry 5	33 +22.2%	27−30 −22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +33.3%	24−27 −33.3%
Hitman 3	25 +38.9%	18−20 −38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	41 +36.7%	30−33 −36.7%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +25%	24−27 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35 +29.6%	27−30 −29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14 +40%	10−11 −40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
+28.6%

21−24

−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Hitman 3	14 +40%	10−11 −40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +28.6%	14−16 −28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	15 +25%	12−14 −25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +25%	16−18 −25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +27.8%	18−20 −27.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	22 +22.2%	18−20 −22.2%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +40%	5−6 −40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+25%

12−14

−25%

This is how RX 580X and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

RX 580X is 20% faster in 1080p
RX 580X is 7% faster in 1440p
RX 580X is 17% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	20.19	16.61
Recency	11 April 2018	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	185 Watt	35 Watt