GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon RX 550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

RX 550
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
7.06

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 550 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking520304
Place by popularity13not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0810.54
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameLexaN18P-G62 Max-Q
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date20 April 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data
Current price$121 (1.5x MSRP)$1183

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has 242% better value for money than RX 550.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121024
Core clock speed1100 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1183 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate37.8676.80
Floating-point performance1,211 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 550 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.140
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 550 7.06
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.60
+135%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 550 by 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 550 2725
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6411
+135%

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon RX 550 by 135% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−157%
54
+157%
1440p10−12
−180%
28
+180%
4K9−10
−156%
23
+156%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−172%
49
+172%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−138%
38
+138%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−157%
50−55
+157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−150%
45
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−160%
75−80
+160%
Hitman 3 18−20
−150%
45
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−138%
107
+138%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−146%
86
+146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−163%
63
+163%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−157%
77
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−172%
49
+172%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−156%
41
+156%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−140%
24
+140%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−157%
50−55
+157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−143%
34
+143%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−160%
75−80
+160%
Hitman 3 14−16
−157%
36
+157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−144%
65−70
+144%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−142%
58
+142%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−152%
53
+152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−158%
62
+158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−157%
54
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−141%
193
+141%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−138%
19
+138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−140%
12
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−144%
22
+144%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−160%
75−80
+160%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−138%
57
+138%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−157%
54
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−167%
32
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−167%
16
+167%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−156%
46
+156%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−167%
30−35
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−167%
30−35
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−140%
12
+140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−136%
33
+136%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−167%
30−35
+167%
Hitman 3 10−11
−150%
25
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−156%
41
+156%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−150%
35
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−180%
14
+180%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Hitman 3 5−6
−180%
14
+180%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−150%
15
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−150%
20
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−200%
9−10
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−144%
21−24
+144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−144%
22
+144%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−150%
14−16
+150%

This is how RX 550 and GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 157% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 180% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 156% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.06 16.60
Recency 20 April 2017 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550
Radeon RX 550
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5830 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 200 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.