GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon RX 5700M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5700M
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
4.00

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms RX 5700M by a whopping 350% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking704313
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Power efficiency1.5728.29
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 10GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2020 (5 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042048
Core clock speed1465 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate247.794.53
Floating-point processing power7.926 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−367%
42
+367%
1440p7−8
−357%
32
+357%
4K6−7
−367%
28
+367%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 47
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−1033%
30−35
+1033%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 42
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−1067%
35
+1067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1000%
65−70
+1000%
Valorant 24−27
−463%
130−140
+463%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−2638%
210−220
+2638%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 29
Dota 2 7−8
−1586%
118
+1586%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−767%
26
+767%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1000%
65−70
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1060%
58
+1060%
Valorant 24−27
−463%
130−140
+463%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 25
Dota 2 7−8
−1471%
110
+1471%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
−533%
19
+533%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−1000%
65−70
+1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−560%
33
+560%
Valorant 24−27
−463%
130−140
+463%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 2−3
−1750%
37
+1750%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Valorant 0−1 95−100

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 62
+0%
62
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how RX 5700M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 367% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 357% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 367% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 7100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 24 tests (40%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (60%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 17.99
Recency 1 March 2020 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 45 Watt

RX 5700M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 349.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5700M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2568 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700M or GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.