Arc A580 vs Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4000 Max-Q
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
32.70

Arc A580 outperforms RTX 4000 Max-Q by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking15185
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.38
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)no data
GPU code nameN19E-Q3 MAX-QDG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date27 May 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current priceno data$337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25603072
Core clock speed780 - 960 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed1380 - 1485 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 - 90 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate220.8384.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and Arc A580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 Max-Q 32.70
Arc A580 41.42
+26.7%

Arc A580 outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q by 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 12627
+9%
Arc A580 11584

Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q outperforms Arc A580 by 9% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 23574
Arc A580 35210
+49.4%

Arc A580 outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q by 49% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 17049
Arc A580 27574
+61.7%

Arc A580 outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q by 62% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX 4000 Max-Q 35167
Arc A580 113974
+224%

Arc A580 outperforms Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q by 224% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
−4.2%
99
+4.2%
1440p46
−21.7%
56
+21.7%
4K49
+36.1%
36
−36.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 no data
Metro Exodus 100−105 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Battlefield 5 100−110 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 no data
Metro Exodus 100−105 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−25%
70−75
+25%
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 130−140 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%
Far Cry 5 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Metro Exodus 60−65 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30 no data

This is how RTX 4000 Max-Q and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 4% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 22% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4000 Max-Q is 36% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.70 41.42
Recency 27 May 2019 10 October 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 175 Watt

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 13 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 179 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.