UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs Radeon RX 5700M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5700M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 5700M
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 180 Watt
3.82

Graphics 750 32EUs outperforms 5700M by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking760750
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.63no data
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 10Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2020 (5 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230432
Core clock speed1465 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1720 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Wattno data
Texture fill rate247.7no data
Floating-point processing power7.926 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs144no data
L2 Cache8 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−14.3%
16
+14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
−20%
18
+20%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−27.3%
14
+27.3%
Fortnite 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
−6.7%
16
+6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+2.9%
34
−2.9%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−18.2%
13
+18.2%
Fortnite 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−8.3%
13
+8.3%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
−1.9%
50−55
+1.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
15
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+12.9%
31
−12.9%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−9.1%
12
+9.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+6%
50−55
−6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
−4.5%
21−24
+4.5%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Valorant 40−45
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 18−20
−5.3%
20−22
+5.3%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
−8.3%
12−14
+8.3%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

This is how RX 5700M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 14% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700M is 17% faster.
  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 27% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700M performs better in 3 tests (8%)
  • UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs performs better in 18 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 17 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.82 3.95
Recency 1 March 2020 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

RX 5700M has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, on the other hand, has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 5700M and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5700M or UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.