Radeon RX 5700M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 280M GTX 280M SLI GTX 285M GTX 285M SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 5300M Radeon RX 5500M Radeon RX 5600M Radeon RX 5700M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon RX 5700M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 285M SLI
2009
2 GB GDDR3, 150 Watt
3.83

RX 5700M outperforms GTX 285M SLI by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 285M SLI GTX 285M SLI
RX 5700M RX 5700M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking708705
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.871.57
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN10E-GTXNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 March 2009 (16 years ago)1 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562304
Core clock speed576 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1720 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rateno data247.7
Floating-point processing powerno data7.926 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1020 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+0%
60−65
+0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−1.4%
70−75
+1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 285M SLI and RX 5700M compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5700M is 1% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5700M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • there's a draw in 57 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.83 3.85
Recency 2 March 2009 1 March 2020
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 180 Watt

GTX 285M SLI has 20% lower power consumption.

RX 5700M, on the other hand, has a 0.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 285M SLI and Radeon RX 5700M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
AMD Radeon RX 5700M
Radeon RX 5700M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
GTX 480M GeForce GTX 480M
RX 5700M Radeon RX 5700M
vs
GT 750M Mac Edition GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GTX 285M SLI GeForce GTX 285M SLI
vs
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
RTX A400 RTX A400
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB
ATI IGP 345M Radeon IGP 345M
vs
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
ATI HD 5450 Radeon HD 5450
vs
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB
RX Vega 56 Mobile Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
vs
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
vs
RX 5700M Radeon RX 5700M
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
vs
Iris Pro Graphics 580 Pro Graphics 580
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
vs
GTX 760M GTX 760M
Radeon 530X Radeon 530X
vs
GT 740M GT 740M
GTX 750 v2 GeForce GTX 750 v2
vs
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 285M SLI or Radeon RX 5700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.