Radeon Pro 5600M vs RX 5600 XT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT with Radeon Pro 5600M, including specs and performance data.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
35.29
+47.5%

RX 5600 XT outperforms Pro 5600M by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking142232
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.51no data
Power efficiency16.4033.36
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameNavi 10Navi 12
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date21 January 2020 (4 years ago)15 June 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Core clock speed1130 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1030 MHz
Number of transistors10,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate224.6164.8
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS5.274 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs144160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6HBM2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz770 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s394.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.29
+47.5%
Pro 5600M 23.93

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13616
+47.5%
Pro 5600M 9232

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+52.9%
70−75
−52.9%
1440p60
+50%
40−45
−50%
4K35
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.61no data
1440p4.65no data
4K7.97no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 83
+113%
35−40
−113%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+46.2%
50−55
−46.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
+124%
40−45
−124%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+46.2%
75−80
−46.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 104
+112%
45−50
−112%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+89.7%
35−40
−89.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+41.3%
60−65
−41.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+28.4%
140−150
−28.4%
Hitman 3 83
+72.9%
45−50
−72.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 275
+148%
110−120
−148%
Metro Exodus 144
+75.6%
80−85
−75.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 112
+77.8%
60−65
−77.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+56.8%
80−85
−56.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 262
+159%
100−110
−159%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 173
+233%
50−55
−233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+85.4%
40−45
−85.4%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+46.2%
75−80
−46.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 98
+100%
45−50
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+61.5%
35−40
−61.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 85−90
+41.3%
60−65
−41.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+28.4%
140−150
−28.4%
Hitman 3 83
+72.9%
45−50
−72.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 272
+145%
110−120
−145%
Metro Exodus 140
+70.7%
80−85
−70.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 94
+49.2%
60−65
−49.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
+95.1%
80−85
−95.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+42.3%
50−55
−42.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 248
+146%
100−110
−146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+46.2%
50−55
−46.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
+51.2%
40−45
−51.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 79
+61.2%
45−50
−61.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+38.5%
35−40
−38.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Forza Horizon 4 138
−2.2%
140−150
+2.2%
Hitman 3 77
+60.4%
45−50
−60.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
+3.6%
110−120
−3.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 141
+74.1%
80−85
−74.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+61.5%
50−55
−61.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
−189%
100−110
+189%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 88
+39.7%
60−65
−39.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+50%
35−40
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+52%
24−27
−52%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45
+95.7%
21−24
−95.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 62
+130%
27−30
−130%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+100%
14−16
−100%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+46.4%
27−30
−46.4%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+48.5%
130−140
−48.5%
Hitman 3 52
+85.7%
27−30
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+81.6%
45−50
−81.6%
Metro Exodus 88
+95.6%
45−50
−95.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 97
+86.5%
50−55
−86.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+69%
27−30
−69%
Watch Dogs: Legion 242
+77.9%
130−140
−77.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 69
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
Hitman 3 36
+89.5%
18−20
−89.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 107
−15%
120−130
+15%
Metro Exodus 51
+88.9%
27−30
−88.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+76.9%
24−27
−76.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+64.3%
14−16
−64.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37
+185%
12−14
−185%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+112%
30−35
−112%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
+96.6%
27−30
−96.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 11
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+85.7%
21−24
−85.7%

This is how RX 5600 XT and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is 53% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600 XT is 50% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600 XT is 67% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 233% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 189% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is ahead in 68 tests (94%)
  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.29 23.93
Recency 21 January 2020 15 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 50 Watt

RX 5600 XT has a 47.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Pro 5600M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2789 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.