ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs RX 5600 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	150	1549
Place by popularity	99	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	48.85	no data
Power efficiency	15.93	no data
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	Navi 10	RS200
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	21 January 2020 (5 years ago)	5 October 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2
Core clock speed	1130 MHz	183 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	180 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	224.6	0.37
Floating-point processing power	7.188 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	2
TMUs	144	2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	AGP 4x
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	192 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+
Resizable BAR	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	7.0
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	2.0	N/A
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	106	no data
1440p	61	no data
4K	36	no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.63	no data
1440p	4.57	no data
4K	7.75	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	21 January 2020	5 October 2002
Chip lithography	7 nm	180 nm

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---