Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX 550X Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 550X Mobile with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

RX 550X Mobile
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
6.06

T1000 outperforms RX 550X Mobile by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking582322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.4623.37
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code namePolaris 23TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 April 2018 (6 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1100 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1287 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate51.48no data
Floating-point processing power1.647 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24
−171%
65−70
+171%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Hitman 3 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
−169%
70−75
+169%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Hitman 3 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Hitman 3 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−170%
100−105
+170%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−169%
35−40
+169%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−160%
130−140
+160%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−165%
45−50
+165%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−156%
100−105
+156%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−173%
30−33
+173%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Hitman 3 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%

This is how RX 550X Mobile and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 171% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.06 16.75
Recency 11 April 2018 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

Quadro T1000 has a 176.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 550X Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 550X Mobile is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 550X Mobile
Radeon RX 550X Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 37 votes

Rate Radeon RX 550X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 388 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.