Quadro T1000 vs Radeon 630

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

Radeon 630
2019
4 GB GDDR5
3.28

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon 630 by a whopping 419% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking703297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.508.58
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameLexaTU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 August 2019 (4 years ago)27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$65 $920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 1616% better value for money than Radeon 630.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speedno data1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1219 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate38.98no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon 630 and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212.0 (12_1)
OpenGL4.64.6
Vulkan+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon 630 3.28
Quadro T1000 17.01
+419%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon 630 by 419% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon 630 1269
Quadro T1000 6580
+419%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon 630 by 419% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−400%
65−70
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Hitman 3 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Hitman 3 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.28 17.01
Recency 12 August 2019 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon 630 is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon 630
Radeon 630
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 31 vote

Rate Radeon 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 297 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.