Radeon Pro 5600M vs RX 5500 XT

Place in performance ranking	214	211
Place by popularity	67	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	15.40	no data
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Navi 14 XTX	Navi 10
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	12 December 2019 (4 years ago)	15 June 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$169	no data
Current price	$317 (1.9x MSRP)	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1408	2560
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1845 MHz	1265 MHz
Number of transistors	6,400 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	162.4	164.8

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 5500 XT and Radeon Pro 5600M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	180 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1540 MBps
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	394.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.66

Pro 5600M 24.06
+1.7%

Pro 5600M outperforms RX 5500 XT by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5500 XT 9160

Pro 5600M 9313
+1.7%

Pro 5600M outperforms RX 5500 XT by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	76 +1.3%	75−80 −1.3%
1440p	42 +5%	40−45 −5%
4K	24 +0%	24−27 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

78
+100%

35−40

−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +71.4%	40−45 −71.4%
Battlefield 5	74 −5.4%	75−80 +5.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −1.6%	60−65 +1.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	61 +56.4%	35−40 −56.4%
Far Cry 5	105 +66.7%	60−65 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	99 +54.7%	60−65 −54.7%
Forza Horizon 4	78 −3.8%	80−85 +3.8%
Hitman 3	101 +40.3%	70−75 −40.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	81 +55.8%	50−55 −55.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	74 +89.7%	35−40 −89.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	86 +62.3%	50−55 −62.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 +60.9%	45−50 −60.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	58 +38.1%	40−45 −38.1%
Battlefield 5	71 −9.9%	75−80 +9.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −1.6%	60−65 +1.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	45 +15.4%	35−40 −15.4%
Far Cry 5	96 +52.4%	60−65 −52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	92 +43.8%	60−65 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	66 −22.7%	80−85 +22.7%
Hitman 3	87 +20.8%	70−75 −20.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	63 +21.2%	50−55 −21.2%
Metro Exodus	52 +30%	40−45 −30%
Red Dead Redemption 2	39 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	72 +35.8%	50−55 −35.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95 +75.9%	50−55 −75.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	64 +39.1%	45−50 −39.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −2.1%	45−50 +2.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +16.7%	40−45 −16.7%
Battlefield 5	68 −14.7%	75−80 +14.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	40 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Far Cry 5	89 +41.3%	60−65 −41.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	83 +29.7%	60−65 −29.7%
Forza Horizon 4	56 −44.6%	80−85 +44.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	58 +7.4%	50−55 −7.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	36 −27.8%	45−50 +27.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −2.8%	35−40 +2.8%
Hitman 3	54 +35%	40−45 −35%
Horizon Zero Dawn	42 +31.3%	30−35 −31.3%
Metro Exodus	31 +29.2%	24−27 −29.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	44 +37.5%	30−35 −37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	37 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Battlefield 5	55 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	20 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	60 +46.3%	40−45 −46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	60 +30.4%	45−50 −30.4%
Forza Horizon 4	41 −19.5%	45−50 +19.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	26 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −5.6%	18−20 +5.6%
Hitman 3	30 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	11 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
Metro Exodus	19 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	15 +15.4%	12−14 −15.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	22 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	31 +19.2%	24−27 −19.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +46.2%	12−14 −46.2%
Battlefield 5	35 +25%	27−30 −25%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	30 +50%	20−22 −50%
Far Cry New Dawn	31 +34.8%	21−24 −34.8%
Forza Horizon 4	21 −61.9%	30−35 +61.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%

This is how RX 5500 XT and Pro 5600M compete in popular games:

RX 5500 XT is 1.3% faster than Pro 5600M in 1080p
RX 5500 XT is 5% faster than Pro 5600M in 1440p
Pro 5600M is 0% faster than RX 5500 XT in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 5500 XT is 100% faster than the Pro 5600M.
in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 61.9% faster than the RX 5500 XT.

All in all, in popular games: