Arc B580 vs Radeon RX 480

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 480 and Arc B580, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 480
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
22.35

Arc B580 outperforms RX 480 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking260109
Place by popularity89not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.8693.94
Power efficiency10.2114.51
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Xe2 (2024)
GPU code nameEllesmereBMG-G21
GCN generation4th Genno data
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date29 June 2016 (8 years ago)16 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B580 has 492% better value for money than RX 480.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042560
Compute units36no data
Core clock speed1120 MHz2670 MHz
Boost clock speed1266 MHz2670 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate182.3427.2
Floating-point processing power5.834 TFLOPS13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs3280
TMUs144160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportn/ano data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length241 mm272 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth224 GB/s456.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity+-
HDMI2.0+
DisplayPort support1.4HDR-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationn/a-
CrossFire+-
Enduron/a-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
HD3Dn/a-
LiquidVR+-
PowerTune+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudion/a-
ZeroCore+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan+1.4
Mantlen/a-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 480 22.35
Arc B580 40.22
+80%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 480 8590
Arc B580 15458
+80%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD77
−63.6%
126
+63.6%
1440p53
−28.3%
68
+28.3%
4K36
−13.9%
41
+13.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.97
−50.5%
1.98
+50.5%
1440p4.32
−18%
3.66
+18%
4K6.36
−4.7%
6.07
+4.7%
  • Arc B580 has 50% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc B580 has 18% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 480 and Arc B580 have nearly equal cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
−268%
206
+268%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−258%
143
+258%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−149%
112
+149%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
−164%
148
+164%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−51.8%
120−130
+51.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−193%
117
+193%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−116%
97
+116%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−144%
173
+144%
Fortnite 207
+27.8%
160−170
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 100
−44%
140−150
+44%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−227%
193
+227%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−85%
140−150
+85%
Valorant 150−160
−45.7%
220−230
+45.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 55−60
−80.4%
101
+80.4%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−51.8%
120−130
+51.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−160%
104
+160%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 285
+2.5%
270−280
−2.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−82.2%
82
+82.2%
Dota 2 110−120
−75.4%
200−210
+75.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−125%
160
+125%
Fortnite 79
−105%
160−170
+105%
Forza Horizon 4 93
−54.8%
140−150
+54.8%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−195%
174
+195%
Grand Theft Auto V 78
−79.5%
140
+79.5%
Metro Exodus 41
−159%
106
+159%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−85%
140−150
+85%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 78
−203%
236
+203%
Valorant 150−160
−45.7%
220−230
+45.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
−51.8%
120−130
+51.8%
Counter-Strike 2 29
−228%
95
+228%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−71.1%
77
+71.1%
Dota 2 110−120
−75.4%
200−210
+75.4%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−110%
149
+110%
Forza Horizon 4 77
−87%
140−150
+87%
Forza Horizon 5 55−60
−69.5%
100−105
+69.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45
−229%
140−150
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−93.2%
85
+93.2%
Valorant 150−160
−45.7%
220−230
+45.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65
−149%
160−170
+149%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−36.4%
30−33
+36.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160
−70.7%
250−260
+70.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
−86.5%
69
+86.5%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−121%
62
+121%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
Valorant 241
−4.6%
250−260
+4.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−62.7%
95−100
+62.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−180%
56
+180%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−134%
110
+134%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−98.1%
100−110
+98.1%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−100%
68
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 39
−151%
95−100
+151%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
−117%
78
+117%
Metro Exodus 15
−207%
46
+207%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27
−211%
84
+211%
Valorant 120
−89.2%
220−230
+89.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−84.4%
55−60
+84.4%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−40%
14
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Dota 2 88
−70.5%
150−160
+70.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−157%
59
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16
−206%
45−50
+206%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18
−167%
45−50
+167%

This is how RX 480 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc B580 is 64% faster in 1080p
  • Arc B580 is 28% faster in 1440p
  • Arc B580 is 14% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 480 is 28% faster.
  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B580 is 268% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 480 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
  • Arc B580 is ahead in 59 tests (97%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.35 40.22
Recency 29 June 2016 16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 190 Watt

RX 480 has 26.7% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 80% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 480 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 480
Radeon RX 480
Intel Arc B580
Arc B580

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1966 votes

Rate Radeon RX 480 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 497 votes

Rate Arc B580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 480 or Arc B580, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.