GeForce FX 5900 vs Radeon RX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 and GeForce FX 5900, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 470
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
21.01
+23244%

RX 470 outperforms FX 5900 by a whopping 23244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2611462
Place by popularity47not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.89no data
Power efficiency12.00no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameEllesmereNV35
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)12 May 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 470 and FX 5900 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048no data
Core clock speed926 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Wattno data
Texture fill rate154.43.200
Floating-point processing power4.94 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs1288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length241 mm218 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s27.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)9.0a
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 21.01
+23244%
FX 5900 0.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 470 8096
+23712%
FX 5900 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72-0−1
1440p38-0−1
4K35-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.49no data
1440p4.71no data
4K5.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 0−1
Hitman 3 40−45 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105 0−1
Metro Exodus 70−75 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 102 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 0−1
Hitman 3 40−45 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105 0−1
Metro Exodus 70−75 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 88 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 0−1
Hitman 3 40−45 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 74 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 0−1
Hitman 3 24−27 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 53 0−1
Metro Exodus 46 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110 0−1
Metro Exodus 21−24 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−12 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.01 0.09
Recency 4 August 2016 12 May 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 130 nm

RX 470 has a 23244.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470
Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4356 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 43 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.