GeForce 8400 vs Radeon RX 470

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 470 and GeForce 8400, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX 470
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
21.05
+9924%

RX 470 outperforms 8400 by a whopping 9924% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2631389
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.96no data
Power efficiency12.100.58
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameEllesmereG98
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date4 August 2016 (8 years ago)4 December 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $69.78

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20488
Core clock speed926 MHz540 MHz
Boost clock speed1206 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate154.44.320
Floating-point processing power4.94 TFLOPS0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1650 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth211.2 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 470 21.05
+9924%
GeForce 8400 0.21

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 470 8096
+9895%
GeForce 8400 81

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD710−1
1440p39-0−1
4K38-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.52no data
1440p4.59no data
4K4.71no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 0−1
Elden Ring 65−70 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 105
+10400%
1−2
−10400%
Metro Exodus 74 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 0−1
Valorant 85−90 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 0−1
Dota 2 48 0−1
Elden Ring 65−70 0−1
Far Cry 5 52 0−1
Fortnite 110−120
+10900%
1−2
−10900%
Forza Horizon 4 88 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 73 0−1
Metro Exodus 34 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 71 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 0−1
Valorant 85−90 0−1
World of Tanks 230−240
+11800%
2−3
−11800%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 0−1
Dota 2 70−75 0−1
Far Cry 5 65−70 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 67 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 59 0−1
Valorant 85−90 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 33 0−1
Elden Ring 35−40 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 33 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+17200%
1−2
−17200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1
World of Tanks 140−150
+14100%
1−2
−14100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 55−60 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 51 0−1
Metro Exodus 46 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1
Valorant 55−60 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Dota 2 33 0−1
Elden Ring 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 33 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 62 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 86 0−1
Far Cry 5 27−30 0−1
Fortnite 25 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 25 0−1
Valorant 24−27 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.05 0.21
Recency 4 August 2016 4 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 25 Watt

RX 470 has a 9923.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 8400, on the other hand, has 380% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 470 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 470
Radeon RX 470
NVIDIA GeForce 8400
GeForce 8400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 4450 votes

Rate Radeon RX 470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 26 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.