Radeon Vega 7 vs RX 460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

RX 460
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
10.64
+42.6%

RX 460 outperforms Vega 7 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking432530
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.12no data
Power efficiency9.8911.56
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameBaffinCezanne
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 August 2016 (8 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896448
Core clock speed1090 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate67.2053.20
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs5628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Length170 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460 10.64
+42.6%
Vega 7 7.46

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 460 8597
+63.8%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 460 5701
+70.3%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 460 34892
+41.1%
Vega 7 24726

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40
+81.8%
22
−81.8%
1440p28
+0%
28
+0%
4K19
−5.3%
20
+5.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.15no data
1440p3.07no data
4K4.53no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 34
+61.9%
21−24
−61.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Metro Exodus 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Battlefield 5 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+57.8%
45−50
−57.8%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+45%
40−45
−45%
Metro Exodus 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Hitman 3 20−22
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 36
+50%
24−27
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Hitman 3 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Hitman 3 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+56.7%
30−33
−56.7%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+50%
8−9
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how RX 460 and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 is 82% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.64 7.46
Recency 8 August 2016 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

RX 460 has a 42.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 is a desktop card while Radeon Vega 7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1030 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1948 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.