FirePro M6100 vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile with FirePro M6100, including specs and performance data.

RX 460 Mobile
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
10.21
+79.4%

RX 460 Mobile outperforms M6100 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking438593
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.86no data
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameBaffinEmerald
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date8 August 2016 (8 years ago)27 May 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896896
Core clock speed1000 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speed1180 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate66.0861.60
Floating-point processing power2.115 TFLOPS1.971 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs5656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.5 (6.0)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.170

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 460 Mobile 10.21
+79.4%
FirePro M6100 5.69

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 460 Mobile 7793
+45.1%
FirePro M6100 5369

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 460 Mobile 5108
+33.1%
FirePro M6100 3837

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RX 460 Mobile 31294
+23.5%
FirePro M6100 25342

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−36.1%
49
+36.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.39no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+86.1%
35−40
−86.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+65%
20−22
−65%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+31.3%
45−50
−31.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+113%
14−16
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+75%
16−18
−75%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+86.1%
35−40
−86.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+65%
20−22
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+42.1%
18−20
−42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+31.3%
45−50
−31.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+86.1%
35−40
−86.1%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+65%
20−22
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−11.8%
18−20
+11.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+31.3%
45−50
−31.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+200%
14−16
−200%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+82.9%
35−40
−82.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hitman 3 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+300%
10−12
−300%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

This is how RX 460 Mobile and FirePro M6100 compete in popular games:

  • FirePro M6100 is 36% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 460 Mobile is 500% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FirePro M6100 is 12% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 460 Mobile is ahead in 68 tests (99%)
  • FirePro M6100 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.21 5.69
Recency 8 August 2016 27 May 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

RX 460 Mobile has a 79.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 460 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 460 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M6100 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Radeon RX 460 Mobile
AMD FirePro M6100
FirePro M6100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 149 votes

Rate FirePro M6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.