GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon RX 460 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Radeon RX 460 Mobile with GeForce GTX 280, including specs and performance data.
RX 460 Mobile outperforms GTX 280 by a whopping 203% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 449 | 741 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.12 |
Power efficiency | 12.69 | 0.98 |
Architecture | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
GPU code name | Baffin | GT200 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 8 August 2016 (8 years ago) | 16 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | $649 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 602 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 236 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | no data | 105 °C |
Texture fill rate | 66.08 | 48.16 |
Floating-point processing power | 2.115 TFLOPS | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 16 | 32 |
TMUs | 56 | 80 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 267 mm |
Height | no data | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
SLI options | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1107 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 141.7 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | HDTVDual Link DVI |
Multi monitor support | no data | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | no data | 2048x1536 |
Audio input for HDMI | no data | S/PDIF |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
FreeSync | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 35
+250%
| 10−12
−250%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | 2.46
+2541%
| 64.90
−2541%
|
- RX 460 Mobile has 2541% lower cost per frame in 1080p
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+225%
|
8−9
−225%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+225%
|
12−14
−225%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+242%
|
12−14
−242%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
+228%
|
18−20
−228%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+225%
|
8−9
−225%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 75−80
+225%
|
24−27
−225%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30
+238%
|
8−9
−238%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+225%
|
12−14
−225%
|
World of Tanks | 140−150
+222%
|
45−50
−222%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
+230%
|
10−11
−230%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+260%
|
5−6
−260%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
+260%
|
10−11
−260%
|
Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+242%
|
12−14
−242%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+233%
|
12−14
−233%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 24−27
+225%
|
8−9
−225%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 22
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
Valorant | 35−40
+225%
|
12−14
−225%
|
1440p
High Preset
Dota 2 | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+250%
|
4−5
−250%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+243%
|
14−16
−243%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
World of Tanks | 70−75
+243%
|
21−24
−243%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+217%
|
6−7
−217%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+210%
|
10−11
−210%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
Far Cry 5 | 21−24
+214%
|
7−8
−214%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+229%
|
7−8
−229%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 14−16
+275%
|
4−5
−275%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+217%
|
6−7
−217%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
Valorant | 24−27
+213%
|
8−9
−213%
|
4K
High Preset
Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Dota 2 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Metro Exodus | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+222%
|
9−10
−222%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+500%
|
1−2
−500%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Battlefield 5 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 4−5
+300%
|
1−2
−300%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
Dota 2 | 20−22
+233%
|
6−7
−233%
|
Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+300%
|
3−4
−300%
|
Fortnite | 10−12
+267%
|
3−4
−267%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+225%
|
4−5
−225%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+250%
|
2−3
−250%
|
Valorant | 10−11
+233%
|
3−4
−233%
|
This is how RX 460 Mobile and GTX 280 compete in popular games:
- RX 460 Mobile is 250% faster in 1080p
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 10.12 | 3.34 |
Recency | 8 August 2016 | 16 June 2008 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 236 Watt |
RX 460 Mobile has a 203% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 329.1% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX 460 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 280 in performance tests.
Be aware that Radeon RX 460 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 280 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.