Radeon RX 7800 XT vs R9 M485X

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M485X with Radeon RX 7800 XT, including specs and performance data.

R9 M485X
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.49

RX 7800 XT outperforms R9 M485X by a whopping 565% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46330
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.91
Power efficiency2.6416.67
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAmethystNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 May 2016 (8 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483840
Core clock speed723 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54583.2
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs128240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M485X 9.49
RX 7800 XT 63.09
+565%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M485X 3660
RX 7800 XT 24339
+565%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−627%
218
+627%
1440p18−20
−578%
122
+578%
4K10−12
−630%
73
+630%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.29
1440pno data4.09
4Kno data6.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1620%
258
+1620%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−674%
178
+674%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−1486%
222
+1486%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−586%
190−200
+586%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−500%
110−120
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−1187%
193
+1187%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−414%
110−120
+414%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Hitman 3 18−20
−589%
120−130
+589%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−340%
230−240
+340%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−417%
150−160
+417%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−354%
110−120
+354%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−726%
250−260
+726%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−146%
150−160
+146%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−1035%
261
+1035%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−1193%
181
+1193%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−586%
190−200
+586%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−500%
110−120
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−973%
161
+973%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−414%
110−120
+414%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−481%
150−160
+481%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−265%
230−240
+265%
Hitman 3 18−20
−589%
120−130
+589%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−340%
230−240
+340%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−417%
150−160
+417%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−354%
110−120
+354%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−1184%
398
+1184%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−408%
130−140
+408%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−146%
150−160
+146%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−465%
130
+465%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−1029%
158
+1029%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−500%
110−120
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−887%
148
+887%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−414%
110−120
+414%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−252%
222
+252%
Hitman 3 18−20
−589%
120−130
+589%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−417%
274
+417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−997%
340
+997%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−669%
200
+669%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−138%
145
+138%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−354%
110−120
+354%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−678%
140−150
+678%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−600%
95−100
+600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1222%
119
+1222%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−2380%
124
+2380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−640%
70−75
+640%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−2325%
97
+2325%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−564%
70−75
+564%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−561%
270−280
+561%
Hitman 3 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−985%
217
+985%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−1038%
148
+1038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−2109%
243
+2109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−1533%
147
+1533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−292%
230−240
+292%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−556%
100−110
+556%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−711%
70−75
+711%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−771%
60−65
+771%
Hitman 3 6−7
−800%
50−55
+800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−472%
220−230
+472%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1243%
90−95
+1243%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1586%
118
+1586%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1680%
89
+1680%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−1700%
72
+1700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1025%
45−50
+1025%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4300%
44
+4300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−760%
40−45
+760%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1267%
164
+1267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2067%
130
+2067%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−2133%
67
+2133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−611%
60−65
+611%

This is how R9 M485X and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 627% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 578% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 630% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed R9 M485X in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.49 63.09
Recency 15 May 2016 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 263 Watt

R9 M485X has 5.2% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 564.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Radeon R9 M485X
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M485X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2750 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.