Radeon RX 7800 XT vs R9 M360

Place in the ranking	648	30
Place by popularity	not in top-100	40
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	68.04
Power efficiency	no data	16.72
Architecture	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Tropo	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	5 May 2015 (9 years ago)	25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	3840
Compute units	8	no data
Core clock speed	900 MHz	1295 MHz
Boost clock speed	925 MHz	2430 MHz
Number of transistors	1,500 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	263 Watt
Texture fill rate	29.60	583.2
Floating-point processing power	0.9472 TFLOPS	37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	96
TMUs	32	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1125 MHz	2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	624.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity	+	-
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
HD3D	+	-
PowerTune	+	-
DualGraphics	+	-
ZeroCore	+	-
Switchable graphics	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	2.2
Vulkan	-	1.3
Mantle	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M360 4.70

RX 7800 XT 63.18
+1244%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 M360 1812

RX 7800 XT 24375
+1245%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16−18 −1250%	216 +1250%
1440p	9−10 −1256%	122 +1256%
4K	5−6 −1300%	70 +1300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.31
1440p	no data	4.09
4K	no data	7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

258

+0%

258

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	178 +0%	178 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	222 +0%	222 +0%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	193 +0%	193 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Hitman 3	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	261 +0%	261 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	181 +0%	181 +0%
Battlefield 5	190−200 +0%	190−200 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	161 +0%	161 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Hitman 3	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	398 +0%	398 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	130 +0%	130 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	158 +0%	158 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	148 +0%	148 +0%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +0%	110−120 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	222 +0%	222 +0%
Hitman 3	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	274 +0%	274 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	340 +0%	340 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	200 +0%	200 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	145 +0%	145 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+0%

110−120

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	119 +0%	119 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	124 +0%	124 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	97 +0%	97 +0%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%
Hitman 3	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	217 +0%	217 +0%
Metro Exodus	148 +0%	148 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	243 +0%	243 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	147 +0%	147 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	230−240 +0%	230−240 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

100−110

+0%

100−110

+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Hitman 3	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +0%	220−230 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	118 +0%	118 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	89 +0%	89 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 +0%	72 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	44 +0%	44 +0%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	164 +0%	164 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130 +0%	130 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	67 +0%	67 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

This is how R9 M360 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7800 XT is 1250% faster in 1080p
RX 7800 XT is 1256% faster in 1440p
RX 7800 XT is 1300% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	4.70	63.18
Recency	5 May 2015	25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm

RX 7800 XT has a 1244.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M360 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M360 is a notebook card while Radeon RX 7800 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.