Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon R9 M485X

Place in the ranking	464	200
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.65	54.33
Architecture	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Amethyst	AD107
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 May 2016 (8 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	2048
Core clock speed	723 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.54	129.6
Floating-point processing power	2.961 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.3	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−167%

40−45
+167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −176%	80−85 +176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −186%	180−190 +186%
Hitman 3	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −183%	150−160 +183%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −179%	170−180 +179%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −176%	80−85 +176%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −186%	180−190 +186%
Hitman 3	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −183%	150−160 +183%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −179%	170−180 +179%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −163%	50−55 +163%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −173%	60−65 +173%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −186%	180−190 +186%
Hitman 3	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −183%	150−160 +183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −174%	85−90 +174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −169%	70−75 +169%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −179%	170−180 +179%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−169%

70−75
+169%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −178%	50−55 +178%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −186%	40−45 +186%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −168%	110−120 +168%
Hitman 3	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −183%	170−180 +183%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−181%

45−50
+181%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Hitman 3	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −182%	110−120 +182%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
−167%

24−27

+167%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.49	27.27
Recency	15 May 2016	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	35 Watt

R9 M485X has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 187.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M485X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M485X is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.