Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon R9 M390

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M390 with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

R9 M390
2015
2 GB GDDR5
8.33
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
23.51
+182%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms R9 M390 by a whopping 182% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking471213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data53.45
ArchitectureGCN (2012−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code namePitcairnAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 June 2015 (9 years ago)26 February 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speedno data1485 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2025 MHz
Number of transistors5000 Million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data129.6
Floating-point processing powerno data8.294 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.3
Mantle+-
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

R9 M390 8.33
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 23.51
+182%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

R9 M390 6819
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+197%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−179%
120−130
+179%
4K20
−175%
55−60
+175%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−171%
130−140
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−171%
130−140
+171%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Fortnite 50−55
−178%
150−160
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%
Valorant 85−90
−173%
240−250
+173%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−171%
130−140
+171%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−154%
350−400
+154%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Dota 2 65−70
−173%
180−190
+173%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Fortnite 50−55
−178%
150−160
+178%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−178%
75−80
+178%
Grand Theft Auto V 34
−179%
95−100
+179%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−178%
50−55
+178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−174%
85−90
+174%
Valorant 85−90
−173%
240−250
+173%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Dota 2 65−70
−173%
180−190
+173%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−167%
80−85
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−175%
110−120
+175%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−181%
90−95
+181%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
−178%
50−55
+178%
Valorant 85−90
−173%
240−250
+173%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−178%
150−160
+178%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−181%
45−50
+181%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
−175%
190−200
+175%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−169%
35−40
+169%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Valorant 100−110
−177%
280−290
+177%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−173%
60−65
+173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−175%
55−60
+175%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
−150%
30−33
+150%
Valorant 45−50
−177%
130−140
+177%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Dota 2 30−35
−173%
90−95
+173%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

This is how R9 M390 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 179% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 175% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.33 23.51
Recency 9 June 2015 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 182.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M390 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M390
Radeon R9 M390
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 14 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 20 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M390 or RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.