GeForce MX330 vs Radeon R9 M385

Place in performance ranking	579	544
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.42	3.33
Architecture	GCN (2011−2017)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Strato	N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	16 June 2015 (9 years ago)	20 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$999	$1079

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce MX330 has 693% better value for money than R9 M385.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	384
Core clock speed	no data	1531 MHz
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1594 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	56.00	38.26
Floating-point performance	1,792 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M385 and GeForce MX330 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	+	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
DualGraphics	1	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	+	no data
Switchable graphics	1	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	Not Listed	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M385 5.33

GeForce MX330 6.32
+18.6%

GeForce MX330 outperforms Radeon R9 M385 by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M385 2060

GeForce MX330 2445
+18.7%

GeForce MX330 outperforms Radeon R9 M385 by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	18−20 −22.2%	22 +22.2%
4K	18−20 −27.8%	23 +27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−11.1%

10−11
+11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −90%	19 +90%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −80%	9 +80%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +9.1%	11 −9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −23.5%	21 +23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −108%	27 +108%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −63.2%	31 +63.2%
Hitman 3	12−14 −58.3%	19 +58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −125%	27 +125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −85.7%	26 +85.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −75%	14 +75%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −40%	14 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −60%	8 +60%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −25%	15 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −159%	44 +159%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −30.8%	17 +30.8%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −15.8%	22 +15.8%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −33.3%	28 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −25%	15 +25%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −50%	21 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +240%	5 −240%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −72.7%	19 +72.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −50%	12 +50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 +42.9%	7 −42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +200%	4 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +41.7%	12 −41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +18.8%	16 −18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +31.3%	16 −31.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −9.1%	12 +9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+55.6%

−55.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Hitman 3	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Battlefield 5	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−16.7%

7−8
+16.7%

This is how R9 M385 and GeForce MX330 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX330 is 22% faster in 1080p
GeForce MX330 is 28% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M385 is 240% faster.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX330 is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games: