Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs AMD Radeon R9 M380

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

R9 M380
7.20
+142%

Radeon R9 M380 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 by 142% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking506736
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data0.10
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Gen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)
GPU code nameStrato Pro GDDR5Haswell GT3e
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date16 June 2015 (8 years old)5 June 2013 (10 years old)
Current priceno data$1086
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76840
Core clock speed1000 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data45 Watt
Texture fill rate48.0052.00
Floating-point performance1,536 gflops104.0 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M380 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 BiteDRAM + 64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Eyefinity1no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (11_1)
Shader Model6.35.1
OpenGL4.44.3
OpenCLNot Listed1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.80
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M380 7.20
+142%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 2.97

Radeon R9 M380 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 by 142% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M380 2790
+134%
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 1190

Radeon R9 M380 outperforms Iris Pro Graphics 5200 by 134% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+137%
19
−137%
4K24−27
+118%
11
−118%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Hitman 3 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+75%
12−14
−75%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
Hitman 3 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+275%
4−5
−275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+213%
8−9
−213%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Hitman 3 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

This is how R9 M380 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • R9 M380 is 137% faster than Iris Pro Graphics 5200

4K resolution:

  • R9 M380 is 118% faster than Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M380 is 500% faster than the Iris Pro Graphics 5200.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M380 is ahead in 52 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.20 2.97
Recency 16 June 2015 5 June 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

The Radeon R9 M380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9 votes

Rate AMD Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 149 votes

Rate Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.