UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Radeon R9 M380

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M380 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 M380
2015
4 GB GDDR5
7.21

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking546545
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameStratoAlder Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 May 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76864
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Texture fill rate48.00no data
Floating-point processing power1.536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Eyefinity+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
TrueAudio+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_1
Shader Model6.3no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCLNot Listedno data
Mantle+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−21
−16.7%
21
+16.7%
1440p10−12
−10%
11
+10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−28.6%
18
+28.6%
Elden Ring 18−20
+18.8%
16
−18.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−10.3%
32
+10.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
19
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 24−27
−4.2%
25
+4.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+87.5%
8
−87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+133%
6
−133%
Dota 2 24−27
−4%
26
+4%
Elden Ring 18−20
+18.8%
16
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+18.5%
27
−18.5%
Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+11.5%
26
−11.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+108%
12
−108%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+46.2%
13
−46.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+33.3%
18
−33.3%
World of Tanks 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
−96%
49
+96%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+45%
20
−45%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+9.1%
22
−9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+16.7%
6
−16.7%
Elden Ring 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+33.3%
6
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
World of Tanks 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Elden Ring 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how R9 M380 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 17% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 10% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M380 is 133% faster.
  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 96% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R9 M380 is ahead in 14 tests (22%)
  • UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 43 tests (68%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.21 7.22
Recency 5 May 2015 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has a 0.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon R9 M380 and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen).


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 376 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.