Radeon RX 7800 XT vs R9 270X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 270X and Radeon RX 7800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 270X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
12.68

RX 7800 XT outperforms R9 270X by a whopping 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39630
Place by popularitynot in top-10060
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.8667.89
Power efficiency4.8616.53
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameCuracaoNavi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (11 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 1059% better value for money than R9 270X.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803840
Core clock speedno data1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate84.00583.2
Floating-point processing power2.688 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs80240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Eyefinity+-
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+-
CrossFire+-
FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
LiquidVR+-
TressFX+-
TrueAudio+-
UVD+-
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.68
RX 7800 XT 63.01
+397%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

R9 270X 4876
RX 7800 XT 24229
+397%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

R9 270X 6560
RX 7800 XT 49707
+658%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−438%
215
+438%
1440p24−27
−408%
122
+408%
4K14−16
−421%
73
+421%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.98
−114%
2.32
+114%
1440p8.29
−103%
4.09
+103%
4K14.21
−108%
6.84
+108%
  • RX 7800 XT has 114% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT has 103% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT has 108% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−948%
241
+948%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−932%
258
+932%
Elden Ring 35−40
−492%
225
+492%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−185%
110−120
+185%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−770%
200
+770%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−284%
96
+284%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−857%
488
+857%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−389%
171
+389%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−259%
110−120
+259%
Valorant 50−55
−486%
290−300
+486%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−185%
110−120
+185%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−609%
163
+609%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−220%
80
+220%
Dota 2 45−50
−287%
178
+287%
Elden Ring 35−40
−529%
230−240
+529%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−131%
113
+131%
Fortnite 70−75
−243%
240−250
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−680%
398
+680%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
−296%
178
+296%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−320%
147
+320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−129%
210−220
+129%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−259%
110−120
+259%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−358%
170−180
+358%
Valorant 50−55
−486%
290−300
+486%
World of Tanks 170−180
−62.2%
270−280
+62.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
−185%
110−120
+185%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−548%
149
+548%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−196%
74
+196%
Dota 2 45−50
−378%
220−230
+378%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−151%
120−130
+151%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−567%
340
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
−129%
210−220
+129%
Valorant 50−55
−486%
290−300
+486%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−724%
140
+724%
Elden Ring 18−20
−732%
150−160
+732%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−678%
140
+678%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−106%
170−180
+106%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
World of Tanks 90−95
−370%
400−450
+370%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−248%
85−90
+248%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
−708%
97
+708%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−433%
48
+433%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−710%
243
+710%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−448%
148
+448%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−819%
147
+819%
Valorant 30−35
−723%
250−260
+723%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−425%
42
+425%
Dota 2 21−24
−561%
152
+561%
Elden Ring 8−9
−925%
80−85
+925%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−561%
152
+561%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−688%
63
+688%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−465%
200−210
+465%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−561%
152
+561%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−575%
80−85
+575%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−838%
75−80
+838%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−633%
22
+633%
Dota 2 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−556%
100−110
+556%
Fortnite 14−16
−586%
95−100
+586%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−665%
130
+665%
Valorant 12−14
−1015%
140−150
+1015%

This is how R9 270X and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 438% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 408% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 421% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 1015% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed R9 270X in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.68 63.01
Recency 8 October 2013 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 263 Watt

R9 270X has 46.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 396.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 270X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 751 vote

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3176 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.