Radeon RX Vega 7 vs R9 270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 270 with Radeon RX Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

R9 270
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.15
+50.7%

R9 270 outperforms RX Vega 7 by an impressive 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking391503
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1110.89
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameCuracaoVega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 November 2013 (10 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data
Current price$229 (1.3x MSRP)$387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 7 has 416% better value for money than R9 270.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280448
Boost clock speed925 MHz1800 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate74.00no data
Floating-point performance2,368 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 270 and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length210 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+no data
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270 11.15
+50.7%
RX Vega 7 7.40

R9 270 outperforms RX Vega 7 by 51% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 270 5930
+77.1%
RX Vega 7 3348

R9 270 outperforms RX Vega 7 by 77% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
+30.4%
23
−30.4%
1440p55−60
+48.6%
37
−48.6%
4K21−24
+40%
15
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+50%
18
−50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
+42.9%
21
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+50%
14
−50%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+48.6%
37
−48.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
+50%
14
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+46.3%
41
−46.3%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+48.1%
27
−48.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+48.1%
27
−48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+37.9%
29
−37.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+41.2%
17
−41.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+40%
15
−40%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+50%
18
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+38.9%
35−40
−38.9%
Hitman 3 10−11
+42.9%
7
−42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−105
+37%
73
−37%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+50%
20
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+50%
20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+45.8%
24
−45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+50%
80
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+40%
14−16
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+48.1%
27
−48.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+36.4%
22
−36.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+38.5%
13
−38.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+37.9%
27−30
−37.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%
Hitman 3 16−18
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+38.5%
12−14
−38.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Hitman 3 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

This is how R9 270 and RX Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • R9 270 is 30% faster in 1080p
  • R9 270 is 49% faster in 1440p
  • R9 270 is 40% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 7.40
Recency 13 November 2013 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon R9 270 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 270 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Radeon RX Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 566 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4578 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.