GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs Radeon R9 270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 270 and GeForce RTX 2060 Super, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R9 270
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
11.15

RTX 2060 Super outperforms R9 270 by a whopping 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking39177
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.1129.50
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameCuracaoTuring TU106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 November 2013 (10 years ago)2 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 $399
Current price$229 (1.3x MSRP)$374 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 Super has 1298% better value for money than R9 270.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802176
Core clock speedno data1470 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate74.00224.4
Floating-point performance2,368 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+no data
G-SYNC supportno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data
VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270 11.15
RTX 2060 Super 42.88
+285%

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms Radeon R9 270 by 285% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 270 4306
RTX 2060 Super 16559
+285%

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms Radeon R9 270 by 285% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 270 5930
RTX 2060 Super 21970
+270%

GeForce RTX 2060 Super outperforms Radeon R9 270 by 270% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−293%
118
+293%
1440p16−18
−331%
69
+331%
4K10−12
−350%
45
+350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−319%
88
+319%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−321%
101
+321%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−286%
81
+286%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−308%
163
+308%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−325%
102
+325%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−339%
79
+339%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−333%
130
+333%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−311%
144
+311%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−334%
152
+334%
Hitman 3 24−27
−292%
94
+292%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−285%
231
+285%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−311%
144
+311%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−307%
122
+307%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−315%
228
+315%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−285%
104
+285%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−305%
85
+305%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−325%
68
+325%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−329%
150
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−296%
95
+296%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−294%
71
+294%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−300%
108
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−293%
106
+293%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−287%
271
+287%
Hitman 3 18−20
−328%
77
+328%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−291%
293
+291%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−340%
132
+340%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−303%
121
+303%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−309%
184
+309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−308%
163
+308%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
−293%
216
+293%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−336%
61
+336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−336%
61
+336%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−294%
71
+294%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−288%
62
+288%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−311%
74
+311%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−300%
120
+300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−337%
131
+337%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−290%
156
+290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−305%
85
+305%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−321%
59
+321%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−322%
114
+322%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−300%
96
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
−322%
114
+322%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−333%
52
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−292%
47
+292%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−289%
70
+289%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−300%
40
+300%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−319%
88
+319%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−308%
98
+308%
Hitman 3 14−16
−314%
58
+314%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−313%
99
+313%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−314%
87
+314%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−322%
114
+322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−300%
60−65
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
−340%
44
+340%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−290%
82
+290%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−292%
47
+292%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−310%
41
+310%
Hitman 3 10−11
−290%
39
+290%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−300%
55−60
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−322%
38
+322%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−321%
59
+321%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−289%
35
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−314%
29
+314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−329%
30
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−375%
19
+375%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−319%
67
+319%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−300%
56
+300%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−308%
49
+308%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−317%
25
+317%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−320%
42
+320%

This is how R9 270 and RTX 2060 Super compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 Super is 293% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 331% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 Super is 350% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.15 42.88
Recency 13 November 2013 2 July 2019
Cost $179 $399
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 175 Watt

The GeForce RTX 2060 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270
Radeon R9 270
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 566 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 11093 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.