Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs Radeon R7 360

Place in performance ranking	486	289
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.57	no data
Architecture	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Tobago	N19P-Q3 MAX-Q
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Design	reference	no data
Release date	18 June 2015 (9 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$109	no data
Current price	$13.98 (0.1x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1024
Core clock speed	no data	930 / 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	1500 / 1620 MHz
Number of transistors	2,080 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate	50.40	103.7
Floating-point performance	1,613 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R7 360 and Quadro T2000 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	165 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1 x 6-pin	None
Bridgeless CrossFire	1	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
Eyefinity	1	no data
Number of Eyefinity displays	6	no data
HDMI	+	no data
DisplayPort support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration	-	no data
CrossFire	1	no data
Enduro	-	no data
FreeSync	1	no data
HD3D	-	no data
PowerTune	+	no data
TrueAudio	+	no data
ZeroCore	-	no data
VCE	+	no data
DDMA audio	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX® 12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.3	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
Mantle	+	no data
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 360 8.01

T2000 Max-Q 17.90
+123%

Quadro T2000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 360 by 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 360 3093

T2000 Max-Q 6912
+123%

Quadro T2000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 360 by 123% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 360 4110

T2000 Max-Q 8262
+101%

Quadro T2000 Max-Q outperforms Radeon R7 360 by 101% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −146%	59 +146%
1440p	10−12 −160%	26 +160%
4K	16−18 −131%	37 +131%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−133%

27−30
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −152%	53 +152%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −146%	55−60 +146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −133%	27−30 +133%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −133%	40−45 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −129%	45−50 +129%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −137%	80−85 +137%
Hitman 3	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −140%	96 +140%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −146%	86 +146%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −137%	64 +137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −138%	55−60 +138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −150%	45 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Battlefield 5	24−27 −146%	55−60 +146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −133%	27−30 +133%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −133%	40−45 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −129%	45−50 +129%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −137%	80−85 +137%
Hitman 3	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −137%	70−75 +137%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −150%	60 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −152%	53 +152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −138%	55−60 +138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −133%	63 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −150%	25 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −133%	27−30 +133%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −133%	40−45 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −137%	80−85 +137%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −129%	55 +129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −138%	55−60 +138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −136%	33 +136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −129%	55−60 +129%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−124%

47
+124%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −143%	30−35 +143%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Hitman 3	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −125%	35−40 +125%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −136%	30−35 +136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−142%

27−30
+142%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Hitman 3	5−6 −160%	12−14 +160%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −175%	10−12 +175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −150%	20−22 +150%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−129%

16−18

+129%

This is how R7 360 and T2000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

T2000 Max-Q is 146% faster in 1080p
T2000 Max-Q is 160% faster in 1440p
T2000 Max-Q is 131% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.01	17.90
Recency	18 June 2015	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	35 Watt