Radeon RX 6700 XT vs R7 265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 265 and Radeon RX 6700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 265
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
10.37

RX 6700 XT outperforms R7 265 by a whopping 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking40446
Place by popularitynot in top-10098
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.7223.15
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code namePitcairnNavi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date13 February 2014 (10 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $479
Current price$242 (1.6x MSRP)$685 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 1246% better value for money than R7 265.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242560
Core clock speedno data2321 MHz
Boost clock speed925 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate59.20413.0
Floating-point performance1,894 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length210 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support-no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkanno data1.2
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 265 10.37
RX 6700 XT 51.49
+397%

RX 6700 XT outperforms R7 265 by 397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 265 5220
RX 6700 XT 35504
+580%

RX 6700 XT outperforms R7 265 by 580% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−403%
151
+403%
1440p16−18
−438%
86
+438%
4K10−12
−400%
50
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 119
−362%
550−600
+362%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−365%
400−450
+365%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 169
−373%
800−850
+373%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−388%
800−850
+388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−350%
450−500
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
−355%
450−500
+355%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−385%
500−550
+385%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−380%
600−650
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−380%
850−900
+380%
Hitman 3 138
−371%
650−700
+371%
Horizon Zero Dawn 359
−387%
1750−1800
+387%
Metro Exodus 120−130
−365%
600−650
+365%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−395%
550−600
+395%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 342
−382%
1650−1700
+382%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−382%
550−600
+382%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−365%
400−450
+365%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 144
−386%
700−750
+386%
Battlefield 5 160−170
−388%
800−850
+388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−350%
450−500
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
−344%
400−450
+344%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−385%
500−550
+385%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−380%
600−650
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−380%
850−900
+380%
Hitman 3 111
−395%
550−600
+395%
Horizon Zero Dawn 210−220
−393%
1050−1100
+393%
Metro Exodus 73
−379%
350−400
+379%
Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−395%
550−600
+395%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 281
−380%
1350−1400
+380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223
−393%
1100−1150
+393%
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120
−382%
550−600
+382%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 85−90
−365%
400−450
+365%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 125
−380%
600−650
+380%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 100−105
−350%
450−500
+350%
Cyberpunk 2077 85
−371%
400−450
+371%
Far Cry 5 100−110
−385%
500−550
+385%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
−380%
850−900
+380%
Horizon Zero Dawn 193
−392%
950−1000
+392%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 240
−379%
1150−1200
+379%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127
−372%
600−650
+372%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
−376%
400−450
+376%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
−395%
550−600
+395%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
−372%
500−550
+372%
Far Cry New Dawn 120−130
−396%
600−650
+396%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
−391%
280−290
+391%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
−359%
500−550
+359%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
−388%
400−450
+388%
Cyberpunk 2077 56
−382%
270−280
+382%
Far Cry 5 137
−374%
650−700
+374%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−387%
550−600
+387%
Hitman 3 83
−382%
400−450
+382%
Horizon Zero Dawn 145
−383%
700−750
+383%
Metro Exodus 123
−388%
600−650
+388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 173
−391%
850−900
+391%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
−382%
400−450
+382%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−384%
300−310
+384%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
−349%
400−450
+349%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−391%
270−280
+391%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
−389%
230−240
+389%
Hitman 3 48
−379%
230−240
+379%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−393%
350−400
+393%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 57
−391%
280−290
+391%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−373%
350−400
+373%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
−374%
180−190
+374%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
−379%
230−240
+379%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−386%
170−180
+386%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−380%
120−130
+380%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−385%
160−170
+385%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−361%
350−400
+361%
Horizon Zero Dawn 83
−382%
400−450
+382%
Metro Exodus 76
−361%
350−400
+361%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
−386%
170−180
+386%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−390%
240−250
+390%

This is how R7 265 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 403% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 438% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 400% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.37 51.49
Recency 13 February 2014 3 March 2021
Cost $149 $479
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 230 Watt

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 265 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 367 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5981 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.