Radeon RX 6700 XT vs R7 260

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R7 260 and Radeon RX 6700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

R7 260
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 115 Watt
7.49

RX 6700 XT outperforms R7 260 by a whopping 588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking50046
Place by popularitynot in top-100100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.0423.18
ArchitectureGCN 2.0 (2013−2017)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameBonaireNavi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designreferenceno data
Release date17 December 2013 (10 years ago)3 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $479
Current price$205 (1.9x MSRP)$685 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6700 XT has 2129% better value for money than R7 260.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682560
Core clock speedno data2321 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHz2581 MHz
Number of transistors2,080 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate48.00413.0
Floating-point performance1,536 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1625 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth104 GB/s384.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Eyefinity1no data
HDMI++
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D-no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore-no data
DDMA audio+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkanno data1.2
Mantle-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R7 260 7.49
RX 6700 XT 51.50
+588%

RX 6700 XT outperforms R7 260 by 588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R7 260 2891
RX 6700 XT 19886
+588%

RX 6700 XT outperforms R7 260 by 588% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R7 260 4380
RX 6700 XT 35504
+711%

RX 6700 XT outperforms R7 260 by 711% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−619%
151
+619%
1440p12−14
−617%
86
+617%
4K7−8
−614%
50
+614%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−644%
119
+644%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−617%
85−90
+617%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−604%
169
+604%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−681%
160−170
+681%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−607%
99
+607%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−636%
100−110
+636%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−594%
120−130
+594%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−638%
170−180
+638%
Hitman 3 18−20
−667%
138
+667%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−618%
359
+618%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−617%
120−130
+617%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−594%
110−120
+594%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−660%
342
+660%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−613%
110−120
+613%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−617%
85−90
+617%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−700%
144
+700%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−681%
160−170
+681%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−650%
90
+650%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−636%
100−110
+636%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−594%
120−130
+594%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−638%
170−180
+638%
Hitman 3 16−18
−594%
111
+594%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−610%
210−220
+610%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−630%
73
+630%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−594%
110−120
+594%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−603%
281
+603%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
−643%
223
+643%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−613%
110−120
+613%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−617%
85−90
+617%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−594%
125
+594%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−614%
100−105
+614%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−608%
85
+608%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−636%
100−110
+636%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−638%
170−180
+638%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−615%
193
+615%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
−700%
240
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−606%
127
+606%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−600%
84
+600%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−594%
110−120
+594%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−657%
100−110
+657%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−656%
120−130
+656%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−613%
55−60
+613%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−679%
109
+679%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
−720%
80−85
+720%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−600%
56
+600%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−661%
137
+661%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−606%
110−120
+606%
Hitman 3 12−14
−592%
83
+592%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−590%
145
+590%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−669%
123
+669%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−621%
173
+621%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−592%
80−85
+592%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−589%
62
+589%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−642%
85−90
+642%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−686%
55−60
+686%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Hitman 3 6−7
−700%
48
+700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
−610%
70−75
+610%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−613%
57
+613%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−640%
74
+640%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−660%
35−40
+660%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−700%
48
+700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−600%
35−40
+600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−725%
30−35
+725%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−660%
75−80
+660%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−592%
83
+592%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−660%
76
+660%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−600%
35
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−600%
45−50
+600%

This is how R7 260 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 619% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 617% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 614% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.49 51.50
Recency 17 December 2013 3 March 2021
Cost $109 $479
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 230 Watt

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 260 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R7 260
Radeon R7 260
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Radeon RX 6700 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 49 votes

Rate Radeon R7 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5994 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.