Intel HD Graphics 505 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 56%
AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 1030
  • Max video memory 4096 MB
  • Memory type DDR3
  • Memory clock speed 1000
  • Maximum resolution
Intel HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 505
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x1
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory 8192 Mb
  • Memory type DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 659$
Games supported 56%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating855870
Value for moneyno data0.34
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 9 Apollo Lake (2016−2017)
GPU code nameExo Pro DDR3Apollo Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 May 2015
(7 years old)
1 September 2016
(6 years old)
Current priceno data$659
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

no data
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32018
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed1030 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors690 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)18 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate20.6011.70
Floating-point performance659.2 gflops230.4 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Radeon R5 M330 and HD Graphics 505 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
Quick Syncno data+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectXDirectX® 1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.06.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.1
Vulkan+1.1.97
Mantle+no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M330 1.51
+3.4%
HD Graphics 505 1.46
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 M330 595
+71%
HD Graphics 505 348

Radeon R5 M330 outperforms HD Graphics 505 by 71% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

R5 M330 1689
+172%
HD Graphics 505 620

Radeon R5 M330 outperforms HD Graphics 505 by 172% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R5 M330 4897
+43.5%
HD Graphics 505 3414

Radeon R5 M330 outperforms HD Graphics 505 by 43% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R5 M330 843
+120%
HD Graphics 505 383

Radeon R5 M330 outperforms HD Graphics 505 by 120% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

R5 M330 922
+126%
HD Graphics 505 408

Radeon R5 M330 outperforms HD Graphics 505 by 126% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R5 M330 and HD Graphics 505. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 58 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
+0%
9
+0%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 1.51 1.46
Recency 7 May 2015 1 September 2016
Pipelines / CUDA cores 320 18
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 18 Watt 10 Watt

Technical City couldn't decide between

AMD Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M330

and

Intel HD Graphics 505
HD Graphics 505

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Radeon R5 M330 by NVIDIA

According to our data, the nearest equivalent to Radeon R5 M330 by NVIDIA is GeForce 910M, which is slower by 1% and lower by 5 positions in our rating.

NVIDIA GeForce 910M GeForce 910M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R5 M330:

Radeon R5 M330 100
GeForce 910M 99.34

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 540 ratings

Rate AMD Radeon R5 M330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 140 ratings

Rate Intel HD Graphics 505 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.