GeForce RTX 4090 vs Radeon R5 M255

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

R5 M255
2014
4096 MB DDR3
1.38

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 7146% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking9621
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.07
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameTopaz Pro / SunAD102-300-A1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 May 2014 (10 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599
Current priceno data$1756 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32016384
Compute units5no data
Core clock speed940 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed940 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors1,550 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data450 Watt
Texture fill rate22.561,290
Floating-point performance721.9 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R5 M255 and GeForce RTX 4090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0 x8no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Eyefinity+no data
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
Enduro-no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
Mantle+no data
CUDAno data8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R5 M255 1.38
RTX 4090 100.00
+7146%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 7146% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R5 M255 534
RTX 4090 38705
+7148%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 7148% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R5 M255 5399
RTX 4090 137170
+2441%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 2441% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R5 M255 1784
RTX 4090 104937
+5782%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 5782% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 M255 1081
RTX 4090 73174
+6672%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 6672% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R5 M255 6053
RTX 4090 250667
+4041%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 4041% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 6
RTX 4090 310
+5067%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 5067% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 9
RTX 4090 127
+1360%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 1360% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 3
RTX 4090 28
+755%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 755% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 5
RTX 4090 265
+5421%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 5421% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 16
RTX 4090 120
+666%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 666% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 3
RTX 4090 268
+7782%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 7782% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 14
RTX 4090 437
+2977%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 2977% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

R5 M255 14
RTX 4090 84
+489%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms Radeon R5 M255 by 489% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p21
−7043%
1500−1550
+7043%
Full HD13
−1938%
265
+1938%
1440p2−3
−10500%
212
+10500%
4K2−3
−7400%
150
+7400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6
−3650%
225
+3650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 235
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1878%
170−180
+1878%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5450%
222
+5450%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−31100%
300−350
+31100%
Hitman 3 2−3
−10850%
210−220
+10850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−27400%
275
+27400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4450%
180−190
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4100%
294
+4100%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 221
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1878%
170−180
+1878%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5250%
214
+5250%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−31100%
300−350
+31100%
Hitman 3 2−3
−10850%
210−220
+10850%
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−24900%
250
+24900%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−11200%
226
+11200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−4450%
180−190
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
−4014%
288
+4014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−14225%
573
+14225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 179
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5150%
210
+5150%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−31100%
300−350
+31100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
−10067%
305
+10067%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−4867%
140−150
+4867%
Hitman 3 4−5
−5225%
210−220
+5225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2863%
237
+2863%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 90−95
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−5320%
271
+5320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−9200%
186
+9200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−13300%
268
+13300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2571%
187
+2571%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 60−65

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 120
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 120
Far Cry 5 3−4
−5667%
173
+5667%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%

This is how R5 M255 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 7043% faster than R5 M255 in 900p
  • RTX 4090 is 1938% faster than R5 M255 in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 10500% faster than R5 M255 in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 7400% faster than R5 M255 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 4090 is 31100% faster than the R5 M255.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed R5 M255 in all 32 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.38 100.00
Recency 1 May 2014 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R5 M255 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R5 M255 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R5 M255
Radeon R5 M255
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 53 votes

Rate Radeon R5 M255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 11348 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.