GeForce MX330 vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

Place in performance ranking	122	545
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.39	3.33
Architecture	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Vega 10	N17S-LP / N17S-G3
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)	20 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$999	no data
Current price	$2172 (2.2x MSRP)	$1079

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 8200 has 212% better value for money than GeForce MX330.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	384
Core clock speed	1200 MHz	1531 MHz
Boost clock speed	1500 MHz	1594 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	230 Watt	25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	336.0	38.26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 8200 and GeForce MX330 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	512.0 GB/s	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.125	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 8200 35.83
+466%

GeForce MX330 6.33

Radeon Pro WX 8200 outperforms GeForce MX330 by 466% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 8200 13835
+466%

GeForce MX330 2443

Radeon Pro WX 8200 outperforms GeForce MX330 by 466% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	120−130 +445%	22 −445%
4K	130−140 +442%	24 −442%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

55−60
+450%

10−11

−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +426%	19 −426%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +456%	9 −456%
Battlefield 5	100−105 +456%	18−20 −456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 +445%	11 −445%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +450%	10−11 −450%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +424%	21 −424%
Far Cry New Dawn	150−160 +456%	27 −456%
Forza Horizon 4	170−180 +448%	31 −448%
Hitman 3	90−95 +463%	16 −463%
Horizon Zero Dawn	220−230 +464%	39 −464%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +456%	27 −456%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +438%	26 −438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
Watch Dogs: Legion	75−80 +436%	14 −436%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 +436%	14 −436%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +463%	8 −463%
Battlefield 5	100−105 +456%	18−20 −456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +450%	10 −450%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +450%	10−11 −450%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +456%	18 −456%
Far Cry New Dawn	100−105 +426%	19 −426%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +433%	30−33 −433%
Hitman 3	65−70 +442%	12 −442%
Horizon Zero Dawn	550−600 +419%	106 −419%
Metro Exodus	95−100 +459%	17 −459%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 +424%	21 −424%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−105 +426%	19 −426%
Watch Dogs: Legion	400−450 +433%	75 −433%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +400%	7 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +425%	4 −425%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +450%	10−11 −450%
Far Cry 5	65−70 +442%	12 −442%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +463%	16 −463%
Horizon Zero Dawn	90−95 +463%	16 −463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 +424%	21−24 −424%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +442%	12 −442%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +438%	24−27 −438%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

+456%

9
−456%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +442%	12−14 −442%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 +456%	9−10 −456%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +463%	8−9 −463%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +450%	10−11 −450%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +445%	10−12 −445%
Hitman 3	55−60 +450%	10−11 −450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +436%	14−16 −436%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

60−65
+445%

10−12

−445%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +440%	5−6 −440%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Hitman 3	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +400%	6−7 −400%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +400%	7−8 −400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%