Radeon RX 5700 vs Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 with Radeon RX 5700, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
20.22

RX 5700 outperforms Pro WX 7100 by an impressive 84% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking280131
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.2643.83
Power efficiency10.7314.25
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameEllesmereNavi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 5700 has 431% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23042304
Core clock speed1188 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate179.0248.4
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS7.949 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs144144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm268 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 7100 20.22
RX 5700 37.18
+83.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7819
RX 5700 14375
+83.8%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro WX 7100 39388
RX 5700 68796
+74.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−96.7%
118
+96.7%
1440p35−40
−103%
71
+103%
4K21−24
−110%
44
+110%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.32
−350%
2.96
+350%
1440p22.83
−364%
4.92
+364%
4K38.05
−380%
7.93
+380%
  • RX 5700 has 350% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5700 has 364% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5700 has 380% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
−212%
159
+212%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−128%
82
+128%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−110%
84
+110%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
−137%
121
+137%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−45.6%
115
+45.6%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−86.1%
67
+86.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−87.5%
75
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−140%
156
+140%
Fortnite 100−110
−64.4%
166
+64.4%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−69.2%
132
+69.2%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−138%
126
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−110%
151
+110%
Valorant 140−150
−106%
294
+106%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
−37.3%
70
+37.3%
Battlefield 5 75−80
−32.9%
105
+32.9%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−58.3%
57
+58.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−20.4%
270−280
+20.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−67.5%
67
+67.5%
Dota 2 100−110
−44.4%
156
+44.4%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−122%
144
+122%
Fortnite 100−110
−38.6%
140
+38.6%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−66.7%
130
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−83%
97
+83%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−93%
137
+93%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−112%
87
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−100%
144
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−172%
147
+172%
Valorant 140−150
−103%
291
+103%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
−22.8%
97
+22.8%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
−38.9%
50
+38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−45%
58
+45%
Dota 2 100−110
−35.2%
146
+35.2%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−108%
135
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−51.3%
118
+51.3%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−77.4%
94
+77.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−93.1%
139
+93.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−68.5%
91
+68.5%
Valorant 140−150
−11.9%
160
+11.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
−16.8%
118
+16.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−45%
27−30
+45%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−72.5%
230−240
+72.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−118%
72
+118%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−104%
51
+104%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.3%
170−180
+2.3%
Valorant 180−190
−53.9%
277
+53.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−50%
81
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−100%
36
+100%
Far Cry 5 40−45
−116%
93
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−115%
103
+115%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−88.2%
64
+88.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−103%
60−65
+103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
−75%
77
+75%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
−86.7%
27−30
+86.7%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−88.9%
16−18
+88.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−106%
72
+106%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−107%
31
+107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−71.4%
48
+71.4%
Valorant 100−110
−114%
231
+114%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−86.2%
54
+86.2%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%
Dota 2 65−70
−51.5%
100
+51.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−124%
47
+124%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−112%
70
+112%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−100%
34
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−211%
59
+211%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
−105%
39
+105%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 97% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 103% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 110% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 29% faster.
  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 5700 is 212% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • RX 5700 is ahead in 66 tests (99%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.22 37.18
Recency 10 November 2016 7 July 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 180 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has 38.5% lower power consumption.

RX 5700, on the other hand, has a 83.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1888 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Radeon RX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.