Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Radeon Pro WX 7100

Place in the ranking	279	211
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.06	no data
Power efficiency	10.75	53.72
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Ellesmere	AD107
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	10 November 2016 (8 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$799	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Core clock speed	1188 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1243 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	5,700 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	179.0	129.6
Floating-point processing power	5.728 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	144	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −27.9%	110−120 +27.9%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −29.6%	70−75 +29.6%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −27.3%	70−75 +27.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −27.7%	60−65 +27.7%
Valorant	80−85 −34.1%	110−120 +34.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Dota 2	70−75 −31.9%	95−100 +31.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −34.3%	90−95 +34.3%
Fortnite	100−110 −30.8%	140−150 +30.8%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −27.9%	110−120 +27.9%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −29.6%	70−75 +29.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	70−75 −33.8%	95−100 +33.8%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −27.3%	70−75 +27.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −32.4%	180−190 +32.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −27.7%	60−65 +27.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Valorant	80−85 −34.1%	110−120 +34.1%
World of Tanks	230−240 −28.2%	300−310 +28.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 −32.8%	85−90 +32.8%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Dota 2	70−75 −31.9%	95−100 +31.9%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −34.3%	90−95 +34.3%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 −27.9%	110−120 +27.9%
Forza Horizon 5	50−55 −29.6%	70−75 +29.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −32.4%	180−190 +32.4%
Valorant	80−85 −34.1%	110−120 +34.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Dota 2	30−35 −25%	40−45 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −33.7%	230−240 +33.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
World of Tanks	130−140 −30.4%	180−190 +30.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −34.1%	55−60 +34.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −27.3%	70−75 +27.3%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −32.1%	70−75 +32.1%
Forza Horizon 5	30−35 −25%	40−45 +25%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −30.4%	60−65 +30.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Valorant	50−55 −32.1%	70−75 +32.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Dota 2	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 −31.1%	80−85 +31.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 −20%	24−27 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Dota 2	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Fortnite	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 5	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Valorant	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	19.64	26.42
Recency	10 November 2016	26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	35 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 34.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 7100 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.