Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 7100 and Radeon Pro WX 3200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX 7100
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
19.87
+224%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking280588
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.1912.79
Power efficiency10.736.62
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameEllesmerePolaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 November 2016 (8 years ago)2 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Pro WX 3200 has 56% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304640
Core clock speed1188 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate179.034.62
Floating-point processing power5.728 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs14432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 7100 19.87
+224%
Pro WX 3200 6.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 7100 7818
+224%
Pro WX 3200 2414

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+216%
19
−216%
4K24−27
+200%
8
−200%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.32
−27.1%
10.47
+27.1%
4K33.29
−33.8%
24.88
+33.8%
  • Pro WX 3200 has 27% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Pro WX 3200 has 34% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+264%
14−16
−264%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+177%
12−14
−177%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+264%
14−16
−264%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+216%
24−27
−216%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+177%
12−14
−177%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+225%
20
−225%
Fortnite 100−110
+189%
35−40
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+189%
27−30
−189%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+279%
14−16
−279%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+227%
21−24
−227%
Valorant 140−150
+110%
65−70
−110%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+264%
14−16
−264%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+216%
24−27
−216%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+177%
12−14
−177%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+135%
95−100
−135%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Dota 2 100−110
+120%
49
−120%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+261%
18
−261%
Fortnite 100−110
+189%
35−40
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+189%
27−30
−189%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+279%
14−16
−279%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+238%
21−24
−238%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+310%
10
−310%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+227%
21−24
−227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+260%
15
−260%
Valorant 140−150
+110%
65−70
−110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+216%
24−27
−216%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+177%
12−14
−177%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+233%
12−14
−233%
Dota 2 100−110
+209%
35
−209%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+282%
17
−282%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+189%
27−30
−189%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+279%
14−16
−279%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+227%
21−24
−227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+440%
10
−440%
Valorant 140−150
+110%
65−70
−110%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−110
+189%
35−40
−189%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+207%
45−50
−207%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+371%
7−8
−371%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+365%
35−40
−365%
Valorant 180−190
+173%
65−70
−173%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+500%
9−10
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+258%
12−14
−258%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+243%
14−16
−243%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+244%
9−10
−244%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+267%
12−14
−267%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+106%
16−18
−106%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+460%
5
−460%
Valorant 100−110
+260%
30−33
−260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Dota 2 65−70
+622%
9
−622%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+267%
9−10
−267%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Pro WX 7100 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 216% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro WX 7100 is 1400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is ahead in 66 tests (99%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.87 6.13
Recency 10 November 2016 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

Pro WX 7100 has a 224.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 85 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 7100 or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.