Radeon Pro 560X vs Pro WX 7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pro WX 7100
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
20.45
+115%

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Pro 560X by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking252432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.7214.19
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code namePolaris 12Polaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2017 (7 years ago)5 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data
Current price$582 (0.7x MSRP)$133

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 560X has 32% better value for money than Pro WX 7100.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speedno data907 MHz
Boost clock speed1243 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,700 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate179.064.26
Floating-point performance5,728 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX 7100 and Radeon Pro 560X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7000 MHz5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s81.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 7100 20.45
+115%
Pro 560X 9.52

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Pro 560X by 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 7100 7898
+115%
Pro 560X 3677

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Pro 560X by 115% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro WX 7100 38420
+119%
Pro 560X 17533

Pro WX 7100 outperforms Pro 560X by 119% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+111%
45
−111%
1440p100−110
+104%
49
−104%
4K35−40
+106%
17
−106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 65−70 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 24−27 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

This is how Pro WX 7100 and Pro 560X compete in popular games:

  • Pro WX 7100 is 111% faster in 1080p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 104% faster in 1440p
  • Pro WX 7100 is 106% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.45 9.52
Recency 1 March 2017 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

The Radeon Pro WX 7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 560X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 7100 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Radeon Pro WX 7100
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 52 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 173 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.