Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs Pro WX 3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 3200 and Radeon AI PRO R9700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro WX 3200
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 65 Watt
5.23

AI PRO R9700 outperforms Pro WX 3200 by a whopping 1255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64817
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.88no data
Power efficiency6.1317.99
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code namePolaris 23Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 July 2019 (6 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404096
Core clock speed1082 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2920 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate34.62747.5
Floating-point processing power1.385 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs32256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB32 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 3200 5.23
AI PRO R9700 70.86
+1255%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 3200 2190
AI PRO R9700 29693
+1256%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−1216%
250−260
+1216%
4K8
−1150%
100−110
+1150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.47no data
4K24.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1218%
290−300
+1218%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Far Cry 5 20
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
Fortnite 30−35
−1150%
400−450
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
Valorant 60−65
−1228%
850−900
+1228%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1218%
290−300
+1218%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−1100%
300−310
+1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
−1233%
1200−1250
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Dota 2 49
−1227%
650−700
+1227%
Far Cry 5 18
−1233%
240−250
+1233%
Fortnite 30−35
−1150%
400−450
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−1233%
240−250
+1233%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Metro Exodus 10
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−1233%
200−210
+1233%
Valorant 60−65
−1228%
850−900
+1228%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−1218%
290−300
+1218%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Dota 2 35
−1186%
450−500
+1186%
Far Cry 5 17
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1150%
300−310
+1150%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
−1250%
270−280
+1250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Valorant 60−65
−1228%
850−900
+1228%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−1150%
400−450
+1150%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−1241%
550−600
+1241%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−1251%
500−550
+1251%
Valorant 55−60
−1171%
750−800
+1171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−1233%
80−85
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−1200%
130−140
+1200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−1208%
170−180
+1208%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−1253%
230−240
+1253%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−1200%
65−70
+1200%
Valorant 27−30
−1196%
350−400
+1196%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Dota 2 9
−1233%
120−130
+1233%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 1216% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 1150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.23 70.86
Recency 2 July 2019 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 300 Watt

Pro WX 3200 has 361.5% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1254.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 3200 or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.