Radeon 680M vs Pro W6600M

Place in the ranking	206	502
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	20.94	11.94
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 23	Rembrandt+
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	8 June 2021 (3 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	768
Core clock speed	1224 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	2034 MHz	2200 MHz
Number of transistors	11,060 million	13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	90 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	227.8	105.6
Floating-point processing power	7.29 TFLOPS	3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	32
TMUs	112	48
Ray Tracing Cores	28	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	224.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	2.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600M 26.34
+216%

Radeon 680M 8.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 10525
+216%

Radeon 680M 3334

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110−120 +197%	37 −197%
1440p	60−65 +216%	19 −216%
4K	30−35 +200%	10 −200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +85.7%	28 −85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +43.6%	39 −43.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +193%	27−30 −193%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +126%	23 −126%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +300%	14 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +118%	56 −118%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +89.5%	38 −89.5%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +82.1%	39 −82.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +146%	24−27 −146%
Valorant	100−110 −47.7%	161 +47.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +193%	27−30 −193%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +148%	21 −148%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +409%	11 −409%
Dota 2	90−95 +93.8%	48 −93.8%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +125%	36 −125%
Fortnite	130−140 +163%	50−55 −163%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +160%	47 −160%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +243%	21−24 −243%
Grand Theft Auto V	90−95 +158%	36 −158%
Metro Exodus	70−75 +163%	27 −163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +144%	65−70 −144%
Red Dead Redemption 2	55−60 +146%	24−27 −146%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 +246%	24−27 −246%
Valorant	100−110 +263%	30 −263%
World of Tanks	260−270 +106%	120−130 −106%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +193%	27−30 −193%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 +206%	16−18 −206%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 +522%	9 −522%
Dota 2	90−95 +52.5%	61 −52.5%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +119%	35−40 −119%
Forza Horizon 4	120−130 +205%	40 −205%
Forza Horizon 5	70−75 +177%	26 −177%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170 +144%	65−70 −144%
Valorant	100−110 −33.9%	146 +33.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	45−50 +176%	17 −176%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +176%	17 −176%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +317%	40−45 −317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
World of Tanks	170−180 +184%	60−65 −184%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +244%	16−18 −244%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +243%	7−8 −243%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 +380%	5 −380%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +356%	18−20 −356%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +174%	27 −174%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +238%	12−14 −238%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +313%	14−16 −313%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +147%	17 −147%
Valorant	75−80 +245%	21−24 −245%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%
Dota 2	45−50 +153%	18−20 −153%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 +153%	18−20 −153%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +236%	24−27 −236%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +183%	6−7 −183%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +153%	18−20 −153%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +314%	7−8 −314%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +53.8%	12−14 −53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +400%	2 −400%
Dota 2	45−50 +167%	18 −167%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +270%	10−11 −270%
Fortnite	35−40 +289%	9−10 −289%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +207%	14 −207%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Valorant	35−40 +363%	8−9 −363%

This is how Pro W6600M and Radeon 680M compete in popular games:

Pro W6600M is 197% faster in 1080p
Pro W6600M is 216% faster in 1440p
Pro W6600M is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 522% faster.
in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 680M is 48% faster.

All in all, in popular games: