Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1250 MHz
- Max video memory 16 GB
- Memory type HBM2
- Memory clock speed 1572 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface MXM-B (3.0)
- Core clock speed 1316 MHz
- Max video memory 16 GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 7216 MHz
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 118 | 128 |
Value for money | 1.38 | no data |
Architecture | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | Vega 10 | GP104 |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 27 June 2017 (5 years old) | 21 February 2018 (5 years old) |
Current price | $6074 | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1569 MHz |
Number of transistors | 12,500 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 345.6 | 251.0 |
Floating-point performance | 11,059 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | no data |
Width | IGP | MXM Module |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1572 MHz | 7216 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 GB/s | 230.9 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.125 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | no data | 6.1 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms Quadro P5200 Max-Q by 2% in our combined benchmark results.
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
Radeon Pro Vega 64 outperforms Quadro P5200 Max-Q by 2% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 32.86 | 32.08 |
Recency | 27 June 2017 | 21 February 2018 |
Memory bus width | 2048 | 256 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4096 | 2560 |
Memory bandwidth | 402.4 | 230.9 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro Vega 64 and Quadro P5200 Max-Q. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.