Quadro P3000 Mobile vs Radeon Pro Vega 64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro Vega 16 Radeon Pro Vega 20 Radeon Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 56 Radeon Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64X
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P3200 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200 Max-Q Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro Vega 64 with Quadro P3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Pro Vega 64
2017
16 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
33.21
+99%

Pro Vega 64 outperforms P3000 Mobile by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Pro Vega 64 Pro Vega 64
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking166335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.2115.43
ArchitectureGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameVega 10GP104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40961280
Core clock speed1250 MHz1088 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate345.697.20
Floating-point processing power11.06 TFLOPS3.11 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs25680

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB6 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s168 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Portno data1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro Vega 64 33.21
+99%
P3000 Mobile 16.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro Vega 64 12920
+99%
P3000 Mobile 6492

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+87.5%
64
−87.5%
4K55−60
+96.4%
28
−96.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+0%
63
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+0%
33
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

This is how Pro Vega 64 and P3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 64 is 88% faster in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 64 is 96% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.21 16.69
Recency 27 June 2017 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

Pro Vega 64 has a 99% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

P3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 64 is a workstation card while Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
Radeon Pro Vega 64
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
P3000 Mobile Quadro P3000 Mobile
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
8300 GS 8300 GS
vs
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
HD 8770M HD 8770M
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
GeForce4 MX 460 GeForce4 MX 460
vs
UHD Graphics 630 UHD Graphics 630
ATI HD 4700 HD 4700
vs
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
FX 5950 Ultra FX 5950 Ultra
vs
UHD Graphics 600 UHD Graphics 600
GeForce MX450 MX450
vs
R7 M365X R7 M365X
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
vs
RX 580 OEM RX 580 OEM
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 1000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
GT 1030 DDR4 GT 1030 DDR4
Arc A780 Arc A780
vs
Pro Vega 20 Pro Vega 20
Arc A580 Arc A580
vs
Pro Vega 20 Pro Vega 20

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 21 vote

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 163 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro Vega 64 or Quadro P3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.