Radeon Pro Vega 20 vs Pro Vega 56

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

Pro Vega 56
2017
8 GB HBM2
31.91
+133%

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 20 by 133% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking163350
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation2.9614.38
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code nameVegaVega Mobile
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date14 December 2017 (6 years ago)15 November 2018 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data
Current price$4999 (12.5x MSRP)$360

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 20 has 386% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841280
Core clock speed1247 MHz815 MHz
Boost clock speed1250 MHz1283 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate280.0102.6
Floating-point performance9,677 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon Pro Vega 20 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory typeHBM2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit1024 Bit
Memory clock speed786 MHz1480 MHz
Memory bandwidth402.4 GB/s189.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.91
+133%
Pro Vega 20 13.69

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 20 by 133% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro Vega 56 12353
+133%
Pro Vega 20 5299

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 20 by 133% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 56 25589
+108%
Pro Vega 20 12289

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 20 by 108% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 56 17797
+96.8%
Pro Vega 20 9044

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 20 by 97% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Pro Vega 56 62260
+132%
Pro Vega 20 26839

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 20 by 132% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Pro Vega 56 65703
+145%
Pro Vega 20 26819

Pro Vega 56 outperforms Pro Vega 20 by 145% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+62.3%
61
−62.3%
4K57
+39%
41
−39%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+107%
27−30
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+143%
21−24
−143%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+32.4%
74
−32.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+146%
35−40
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+108%
40
−108%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+116%
35−40
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+113%
45−50
−113%
Hitman 3 95−100
+168%
35−40
−168%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+138%
27−30
−138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+122%
21−24
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+57.4%
47
−57.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+131%
24−27
−131%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+107%
27−30
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+143%
21−24
−143%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+55.6%
63
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 85−90
+146%
35−40
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+124%
37
−124%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+116%
35−40
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+113%
45−50
−113%
Hitman 3 95−100
+168%
35−40
−168%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+138%
27−30
−138%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+122%
21−24
−122%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+94.7%
38
−94.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+132%
50
−132%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+131%
24−27
−131%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+107%
27−30
−107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+143%
21−24
−143%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+63.3%
60
−63.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+124%
37
−124%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+116%
35−40
−116%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+113%
45−50
−113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+106%
31
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+131%
24−27
−131%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+155%
20−22
−155%
Hitman 3 55−60
+167%
21−24
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+126%
18−20
−126%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+183%
12−14
−183%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+150%
10−11
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+165%
16−18
−165%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+240%
10−11
−240%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+146%
27−30
−146%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+229%
7−8
−229%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+159%
21−24
−159%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+144%
24−27
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+148%
27−30
−148%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+200%
14−16
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+200%
9−10
−200%
Hitman 3 30−35
+138%
12−14
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+250%
12−14
−250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+179%
14−16
−179%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+137%
18−20
−137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%

This is how Pro Vega 56 and Pro Vega 20 compete in popular games:

  • Pro Vega 56 is 62.3% faster than Pro Vega 20 in 1080p
  • Pro Vega 56 is 39% faster than Pro Vega 20 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro Vega 56 is 350% faster than the Pro Vega 20.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro Vega 56 surpassed Pro Vega 20 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 31.91 13.69
Recency 14 December 2017 15 November 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 100 Watt

The Radeon Pro Vega 56 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro Vega 20 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro Vega 56 is a workstation card while Radeon Pro Vega 20 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon Pro Vega 20

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 88 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 84 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Vega 20 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.