GeForce GTX 770M SLI vs Radeon Pro 560X

Place in performance ranking	429	335
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	14.29	21.16
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	no data
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 June 2017 (6 years ago)	30 May 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price	$133	$149

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770M SLI has 48% better value for money than Pro 560X.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	1920
Core clock speed	907 MHz	811 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	64.26	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 560X and GeForce GTX 770M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	no data	+

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 3 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 192 Bit
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	no data
Optimus	no data	+

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	11
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	no data	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.50

GTX 770M SLI 14.36
+51.2%

GeForce GTX 770M SLI outperforms Radeon Pro 560X by 51% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro 560X 7590

GTX 770M SLI 9569
+26.1%

GeForce GTX 770M SLI outperforms Radeon Pro 560X by 26% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	41 −46.3%	60−65 +46.3%
1440p	40 −50%	60−65 +50%
4K	17 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−46.7%

21−24
+46.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	43 −14%	45−50 +14%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	39 +5.4%	35−40 −5.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −46.7%	21−24 +46.7%
Far Cry 5	37 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	36 −8.3%	35−40 +8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	53 +3.9%	50−55 −3.9%
Hitman 3	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30 +25%	24−27 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 −20%	30−33 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	36 −36.1%	45−50 +36.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	26 −42.3%	35−40 +42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −46.7%	21−24 +46.7%
Far Cry 5	33 −12.1%	35−40 +12.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	31 −25.8%	35−40 +25.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50 −2%	50−55 +2%
Hitman 3	24−27 −62.5%	35−40 +62.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%
Metro Exodus	19 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10 −140%	24−27 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	25 −20%	30−33 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	34 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 −114%	30−33 +114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	33 −48.5%	45−50 +48.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −46.7%	21−24 +46.7%
Far Cry 5	31 −19.4%	35−40 +19.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 −44.4%	35−40 +44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	36 −41.7%	50−55 +41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 −50%	30−33 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Hitman 3	14−16 −46.7%	21−24 +46.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
Metro Exodus	11 −18.2%	12−14 +18.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −100%	30−33 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −53.3%	21−24 +53.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −64.7%	27−30 +64.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Hitman 3	9−10 −44.4%	12−14 +44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Metro Exodus	7 +0%	7−8 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6 −50%	9−10 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −114%	14−16 +114%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	10 −10%	10−12 +10%
Far Cry New Dawn	9 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −66.7%	20−22 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%

This is how Pro 560X and GTX 770M SLI compete in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI is 46.3% faster than Pro 560X in 1080p
GTX 770M SLI is 50% faster than Pro 560X in 1440p
GTX 770M SLI is 41.2% faster than Pro 560X in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Pro 560X is 25% faster than the GTX 770M SLI.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 140% faster than the Pro 560X.

All in all, in popular games: