GeForce GTX 675M vs Radeon Pro 560X

Place in the ranking	462	629
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	8.86	3.49
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	GF114
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	16 July 2018 (6 years ago)	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	384
Core clock speed	1004 MHz	620 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	64.26	39.68
Floating-point processing power	2.056 TFLOPS	0.9523 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	64	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	no data	PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256bit
Memory clock speed	1270 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	96.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	-	+
HDCP	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	Up to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Optimus	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 API
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560X 9.53
+90.6%

GTX 675M 5.00

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560X 3677
+90.8%

GTX 675M 1927

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560X 7590
+136%

GTX 675M 3218

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 560X 5699
+144%

GTX 675M 2331

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560X 32449
+79.7%

GTX 675M 18056

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro 560X 17560
+176%

GTX 675M 6362

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	90−95 +87.5%	48 −87.5%
Full HD	39 −23.1%	48 +23.1%
1440p	26 +117%	12−14 −117%
4K	15 +114%	7−8 −114%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+87.5%

8−9

−87.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	31 +138%	12−14 −138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Battlefield 5	49 +277%	12−14 −277%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 +164%	10−12 −164%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	28 +155%	10−12 −155%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 +171%	14−16 −171%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +106%	30−35 −106%
Hitman 3	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +65.6%	30−35 −65.6%
Metro Exodus	41 +242%	12−14 −242%
Red Dead Redemption 2	36 +177%	12−14 −177%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	57 +217%	18−20 −217%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +34.8%	45−50 −34.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 +285%	12−14 −285%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Battlefield 5	42 +223%	12−14 −223%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	25 +127%	10−12 −127%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	26 +136%	10−12 −136%
Far Cry New Dawn	28 +100%	14−16 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +106%	30−35 −106%
Hitman 3	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +65.6%	30−35 −65.6%
Metro Exodus	33 +175%	12−14 −175%
Red Dead Redemption 2	29 +123%	12−14 −123%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +44.4%	18−20 −44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +34.8%	45−50 −34.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Far Cry 5	19 +72.7%	10−12 −72.7%
Forza Horizon 4	36 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Hitman 3	18−20 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +65.6%	30−35 −65.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +34.8%	45−50 −34.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

25
+92.3%

12−14

−92.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +111%	9−10 −111%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +273%	10−12 −273%
Hitman 3	12−14 +44.4%	9−10 −44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +100%	6−7 −100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +93.5%	30−35 −93.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16
+77.8%

9−10

−77.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Hitman 3	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +471%	7−8 −471%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +200%	4−5 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+50%

6−7

−50%

This is how Pro 560X and GTX 675M compete in popular games:

Pro 560X is 88% faster in 900p
GTX 675M is 23% faster in 1080p
Pro 560X is 117% faster in 1440p
Pro 560X is 114% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 560X is 600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 560X surpassed GTX 675M in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.53	5.00
Recency	16 July 2018	22 March 2012
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt

Pro 560X has a 90.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 560X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 675M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.