GeForce RTX 3070 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with GeForce RTX 3070, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
23.46

RTX 3070 outperforms Pro 5600M by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking24045
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.71
Power efficiency32.9518.09
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 12GA104
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)1 September 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25605888
Core clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz1725 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt220 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8317.4
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA-8.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 5600M 23.46
RTX 3070 56.67
+142%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232
RTX 3070 22299
+142%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−150%
150
+150%
1440p40−45
−145%
98
+145%
4K24−27
−167%
64
+167%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.33
1440pno data5.09
4Kno data7.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
−331%
263
+331%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−239%
149
+239%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−206%
147
+206%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
−221%
196
+221%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−65.6%
149
+65.6%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−207%
135
+207%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−190%
139
+190%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−103%
154
+103%
Fortnite 110−120
−110%
230−240
+110%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−130%
200−210
+130%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−148%
159
+148%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−103%
170−180
+103%
Valorant 150−160
−86.1%
290−300
+86.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 60−65
−85.2%
113
+85.2%
Battlefield 5 90−95
−46.7%
132
+46.7%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−166%
117
+166%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−11.2%
270−280
+11.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−163%
126
+163%
Dota 2 110−120
−12.7%
133
+12.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−94.7%
148
+94.7%
Fortnite 110−120
−110%
230−240
+110%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−130%
200−210
+130%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−131%
148
+131%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−67.5%
139
+67.5%
Metro Exodus 45−50
−145%
120
+145%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−103%
170−180
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−248%
230
+248%
Valorant 150−160
−86.1%
290−300
+86.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
−32.2%
119
+32.2%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−139%
105
+139%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−113%
102
+113%
Dota 2 110−120
−5.9%
125
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−85.5%
141
+85.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−130%
200−210
+130%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−134%
150−160
+134%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
−103%
170−180
+103%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−83.3%
121
+83.3%
Valorant 150−160
−50%
237
+50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
−110%
230−240
+110%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−139%
350−400
+139%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−145%
98
+145%
Metro Exodus 30−33
−150%
75
+150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
−67.2%
300−350
+67.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
−63.5%
103
+63.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
−139%
55−60
+139%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−182%
62
+182%
Far Cry 5 50−55
−145%
125
+145%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−191%
160−170
+191%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−138%
95−100
+138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−211%
110−120
+211%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
−183%
150−160
+183%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
−156%
45−50
+156%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−182%
30−35
+182%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−179%
117
+179%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−158%
49
+158%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−173%
90
+173%
Valorant 130−140
−136%
300−350
+136%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−106%
70
+106%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−45.5%
16
+45.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Dota 2 75−80
−66.7%
125
+66.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−180%
70
+180%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−200%
120−130
+200%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−138%
50−55
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−304%
90−95
+304%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
−225%
75−80
+225%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how Pro 5600M and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 150% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 145% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3070 is 331% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is ahead in 62 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.46 56.67
Recency 15 June 2020 1 September 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 220 Watt

Pro 5600M has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 340% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has a 141.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 79 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11926 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 5600M or GeForce RTX 3070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.