UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs Radeon Pro 560

Place in the ranking	478	660
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 21	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	5 June 2017 (7 years ago)	15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	48
Core clock speed	907 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.05	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.858 gflops	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	64	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	5080 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	81.28 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 560 9.01
+101%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 4.48

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Pro 560 18982
+78.2%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 10650

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Pro 560 5305
+51.1%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 3510

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Pro 560 3892
+67.7%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 2321

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560 23105
+44.5%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 15992

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Pro 560 198867
+104%

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs 97416

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

30−35
+76.5%

−76.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+27.3%

−27.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +69.2%	12−14 −69.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +155%	10−12 −155%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +114%	27−30 −114%
Hitman 3	16−18 +70%	10 −70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +38.9%	36 −38.9%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +76.5%	16−18 −76.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +69.2%	12−14 −69.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Battlefield 5	27−30 +155%	10−12 −155%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +92.3%	12−14 −92.3%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +114%	27−30 −114%
Hitman 3	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +66.7%	30−33 −66.7%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +108%	12−14 −108%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +76.5%	17 −76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +47.1%	16−18 −47.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +69.2%	12−14 −69.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +80%	10−11 −80%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +110%	10−11 −110%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +114%	27−30 −114%
Hitman 3	16−18 +70%	10−11 −70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +317%	12 −317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 +87.5%	16 −87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +213%	8 −213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27
+108%

12−14

−108%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +113%	8−9 −113%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +125%	4−5 −125%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +100%	5−6 −100%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +375%	8−9 −375%
Hitman 3	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 +100%	4−5 −100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +104%	27−30 −104%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+87.5%

8−9

−87.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +100%	3−4 −100%
Hitman 3	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +800%	4−5 −800%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 +150%	2−3 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+80%

5−6

−80%

This is how Pro 560 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs compete in popular games:

Pro 560 is 76% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 560 is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro 560 surpassed UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in all 67 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.01	4.48
Recency	5 June 2017	15 August 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	28 Watt

Pro 560 has a 101.1% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 560 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.