Radeon Pro W5500M vs Pro 560

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Pro W5500M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro 560
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
9.04
+0.1%

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking492493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.267.28
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code namePolaris 21Navi 14
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date18 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 February 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241408
Core clock speed907 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate58.05127.6
Floating-point processing power1.858 TFLOPS4.083 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1270 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth81.28 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro 560 9.04
+0.1%
Pro W5500M 9.03

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 560 3475
+0.2%
Pro W5500M 3469

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Atomic Heart 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Fortnite 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Valorant 85−90
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Atomic Heart 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+1.5%
130−140
−1.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Dota 2 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Fortnite 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Valorant 85−90
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Dota 2 60−65
+5%
60−65
−5%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Valorant 85−90
+6.3%
80−85
−6.3%
Fortnite 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+8.3%
60−65
−8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Valorant 95−100
+1.1%
95−100
−1.1%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Fortnite 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 40−45
+10%
40−45
−10%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Fortnite 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.04 9.03
Recency 18 April 2017 10 February 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 85 Watt

Pro 560 has a 0.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

Pro W5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro 560 and Radeon Pro W5500M.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 560
AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4
114 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3
4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro 560 or Radeon Pro W5500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.